Unify internal tracker container name across trackers (tracks vs trackers)
Hi, I noticed that the internal container for active track objects is not named consistently across trackers:
SORTTracker uses self.trackers
ByteTrackTracker uses self.tracks
OCSORTTracker uses self.tracks
Could this be unified into a single interface?
This inconsistency makes it harder to build generic utilities on top of the library, because downstream code has to special-case different tracker classes just to access active tracks.
It would be great to standardize on one attribute name (tracks or trackers) and possibly keep the old name as an alias for backward compatibility.
Thanks for considering it.
关闭于 2026-04-25 1 条评论