ITADN

Filter validation for available IPs does not handle custom field constraints for linked objects correctly.

#22738OpenAmir-Bakar 创建于 2026-07-22
type: bugstatus: acceptedseverity: lownetbox
A
Amir-Bakarcommented
### NetBox Edition NetBox Community ### NetBox Version v4.6.5 ### Python Version 3.12 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a user 2. Create a tenant with a custom field `integerCustomField` with a value of `1`. 3. Create a prefix `192.168.0.0/24' and assign it to the tenant. 4. Create permission granting `view`, `add`, `change` and `delete` on object type `IPAM | IP Address` with constraints (see below) for the user. 5. Create permission granting `view` on object type `IPAM | Prefix` for the same user, with the same constraint. 6. Logon using the created user. 7. Navigate to Prefix `192.168.0.0/24`. 8. Click on `IP Addresses` tab. Constraint is this: ``` { "tenant__custom_field_data__integerCustomField": "1" } ``` ### Expected Behavior Seeing button(s) showing available IP(s). ### Observed Behavior The button(s) `X IPs available` are missing. The buttons are visible for users without a tenant custom field constraint. The fix in the related issue worked for the simpler constraint in the related issue, but not for custom fields. Related to netbox-community/netbox#22539 (PR netbox-community/netbox#22628) I do not know how custom fields or rather custom fields of linked objects are handled. If someone could point me in the right direction, I would gladly fix it myself and create another PR.
4 条评论