Interpolation problems in `WorkSans[wght].ttf`

Hello! This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in `WorkSans[wght].ttf`, as found in the Google Fonts catalog. To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click [here](https://github.com/behdad/google-fonts-ofl-interpolatable-results/raw/f7909283ad1e65afe43d920bba367832f78f6730/reports/WorkSans%5Bwght%5D.ttf.pdf); Or to view it on the GitHub website, click [here](https://github.com/behdad/google-fonts-ofl-interpolatable-results/blob/f7909283ad1e65afe43d920bba367832f78f6730/reports/WorkSans%5Bwght%5D.ttf.pdf). The report follows: ``` Glyph .notdef was not compatible: Masters: '', 'wght=600.0122': Contour order differs: [0, 1] in '', [1, 0] in 'wght=600.0122' Glyph dotbelowcomb was not compatible: Masters: '', 'wght=100.0': Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in '', 8 in 'wght=100.0'; reversed: False Glyph hbar.sc was not compatible: Masters: '', 'wght=900.0': Contour 0 start point differs: 0 in '', 1 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: False ``` This report was generated using the `fonttools varLib.interpolatable` tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it. To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at [fonttools](https://github.com/fonttools/fonttools).