[Follow-up] Requesting an explanation for the silent closure of my previous appeal regarding malicious reporting

Description: Hi @JasonBarnabe and the maintainer team, I am writing this follow-up issue because my previous issue (#1537) was closed by @JasonBarnabe as "completed" just minutes after it was opened, without a single word of explanation, investigation result, or feedback. I respectfully request a few minutes of your time to clarify this. As an open-source contributor and a developer who has provided free tools for this community, I find this silent closure deeply discouraging. My account (MabelMoore728) and my free script (ID: 579819) were taken down due to what is clearly a coordinated, malicious reporting attack by competitors (they created multiple sockpuppet accounts to clone my code and report me for "spamming"). I am not here to argue aggressively; I am here to seek basic transparency, which is the foundation of any open-source community: Was my previous issue closed because the malicious reporting loophole is deemed "working as intended"? Is it the official policy of GreasyFork to permanently ban creators and delete their forum appeal posts without any communication or review? If I was genuinely found to be in violation of a rule, could you please explicitly state what that violation is, rather than using a silent ban? If there is a misunderstanding, I am more than willing to cooperate, provide my git history, and prove my originality. But shutting down the conversation entirely and locking out creators leaves us feeling that the platform's review system favors malicious abusers over legitimate free contributors. I kindly request that you do not silently close this issue again. Even a brief explanation of the final decision would be greatly appreciated and would demonstrate that the platform still respects its developers. Thank you for your time and understanding.