Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

Issue 1.
Summary:  Rephrase Scope (3.2)
From:     Lachlan Hunt 
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Aug/0278.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0144.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0146.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Link to test case for each feature
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] General comment
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0019.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0023.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0053.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0075.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0077.html
Closed:   Accepted.
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Say what kind of namespaces
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Abstract section clarity
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0020.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0153.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0157.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0054.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0074.html
----
Issue 4a.
Summary:  Link to or explain "forward compatible parsing rules"
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Conformance with CSS forward compatible parsing rules
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0025.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0189.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0265.html
----
Issue 4b.
Summary:  Move comment on "forward compatible parsing rules" from Intro to Conformance
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Conformance with CSS forward compatible parsing rules
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0025.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0189.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0271.html
Closed:   Rejected
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Avoid "this specification"
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Editorial
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #1
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0057.html
Closed:   Accepted.
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0069.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Rewrite reference to XML-NAMES11
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Editorial
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #2
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0060.html
Closed:   Accepted.
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0070.html
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Rephrase non-normative designation
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Editorial
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #3
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0004.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  "default default namespace"
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Editorial
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0029.html #4
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0038.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0005.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Update references to XML-NAMES
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0026.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0063.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0082.html
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0083.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  RFC2119 should be normative reference
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0021.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0148.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Use RFC2119 for all requirements
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Requirements of the document as framed by RFC 2119
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0022.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0190.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0264.html
----
Issue 11a.
Summary:  Clearly distinguish examples from normative text
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Requirements of the document as framed by RFC 2119
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0264.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0272.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Have an issues list
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Issues list for CSS Namespaces
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0024.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0055.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0073.html
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Clarify conformance section
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0030.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0056.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0072.html
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Link to CSS 2.1 Grammar appendix
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0027.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0145.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Why is url() defined, then discouraged?
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0028.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0006.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0059.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Define "conforming style sheet"
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0032.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0065.html
Closed:   Accepted.
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0081.html
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Case-insensitivity of prefixes causes problems
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0033.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0047.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0086.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0048.html
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0048.html
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0050.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Split apart sentences with many requirements
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0035.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0066.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0080.html
Closed:   ...
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Requirements for undeclared prefixes too lax
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0031.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0067.html
Closed:   Accepted.
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0079.html
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Confusion about @namespace scope and selector matching
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] Scope of Namespace with @import
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0037.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0039.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0273.html
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Namespace prefix represents namespace (name) untestable
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0034.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0068.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0084.html
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  QNames for attributes
From:     Karl Dubost for QA Review
Key:      [css3-namespace] CSS Qualified Names and values of attributes
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0036.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0003.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Clarify justification and consequences of prefix case-insensitivity
From:     Grosso, Paul for XML Core WG
Key:      [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0045.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0008.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  Need normative reference to XML Names 1.0 & 1.1
From:     Grosso, Paul for XML Core WG
Key:      [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0045.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0061.html
Closed:   Partially Rejected
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  Clarify that neither url() nor string syntax accepts normalization
From:     Grosso, Paul
Key:      [css3-namespace] XML Core WG's review
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Sep/0045.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2006Oct/0007.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Case sensitivity issue
From:     Bjoern Hoehrmann 
Comment:  
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0062.html
Closed:   Something.
