# CSS Conditional Rules Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2012-12-13 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-conditional-20121213/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0224.html
    improve examples
    Raised By: Ben Callahan
    Resolution: Editorial, but will improve examples.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/06244e910e27
    Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0231.html

    Issue 2:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0084.html
    @supports not( without space
    Raised By: Simon Pieters
    Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0277.html
    Resolution: require spaces, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0330.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/34b185ae3bac
    Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0232.html

    Issue 3:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0070.html
    What does @supports return when the OS prevents the support?
    Raised By: James Nurthen
    Resolution: user and system preferences do not affect what @supports returns; it's only about UA capabilities, and must be the same as declaration fallback.  So add a clarification of this, but no substantive change.  (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/6e5d9a1539bd
    Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0233.html

    Issue 4:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0436.html
    @supports all
    Raised by: Nicholas Shanks
    Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0442.html
    Resolution: no change, per rationale in reply  (Resolved 2013-02-06, AM I.)
    Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0234.html

    Issue 5:
    Issue in spec about insertRule, followup to Issue 7b
    also raised as first issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    Raised by: David Baron, Florian Rivoal
    Proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0229.html
    Florian agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    Edited: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0256.html
    (Commenter agrees, of course.)

    Issue 6 (prior to LC publication):
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0014.html
    review of the new grammar for @supports
    Raised by: Florian Rivoal
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0239.html
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    Resolution: Already fixed prior to LC; commenter agrees.

    Issue 7a (prior to LC publication):
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
    Each usage of CSSRuleList and MediaList should link to their definition.
    Raised by: Arthur Barstow
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
    No response from commenter.

    Issue 7b (prior to LC publication):
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
    insertRule() should say what happens if index is already used
    Raised by: Arthur Barstow
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
    No response from commenter.

    Issue 7c (prior to LC publication):
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
    not clear why there is a definition of conditionText in this section
    Raised by: Arthur Barstow
    Reason explained in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
    No response from commenter.

    Issue 7d (prior to LC publication):
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Nov/0329.html
    for the second definition of supports(), there is a mismatch between the "declaration" argument and the use of "conditionText" in the text below.
    Raised by: Arthur Barstow
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Dec/0102.html
    No response from commenter.

    Issue 8:
    second issue in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0228.html
    serialization of supports_rule (forgot to edit in previous resolution)
    Raised By: Florian Rivoal
    Resolution: third resolution in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0749.html
    Fixed in https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/7dace721dff3
    Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0235.html
    Additional clarification requested in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0237.html
    Additional clarification added in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/37491845e530
    Additional reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0238.html
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0244.html

    Issue 9:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0236.html
    confusing to have OR in one place and AND and NOT in another
    Raised by: Björn Höhrmann
    Resolution: Assumed editorial
    Fixed in https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/139db90ee7b2
    Reply: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0239.html
    Commenter agrees: http://www.w3.org/mid/0ln8h81t117a49bc0queqm89o2fo4g65n7@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de