# CSS Backgrounds and Borders Level 3 Disposition of Comments

Last call document:http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css3-background-20100612/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected + verified
- Rejected and not verified
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
- Formal Objection (There were no formal objections.)

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1.
    Summary:  Remove 'box-shadow' from At-Risk list
    From:     Sylvain Galineau
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0483.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0479.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 2.
    Summary:  box-shadow spread should specify half the blur radius
    From:     Tab Atkins?
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0513.html
    Response: very long thread resulting in edits :)
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 3.
    Summary:  border-radius for corner-radius confusing; make own section?
    From:     CSS3.info / Jeffrey Gilbert, Krzysztof Maczyński
    Comment:  http://www.css3.info/w3c-issues-last-call-for-comments-on-css3-backgrounds-and-borders/#comment-259427
    Response: http://www.css3.info/w3c-issues-last-call-for-comments-on-css3-backgrounds-and-borders/#comment-259447
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 4.
    Summary:  inset box-shadow should paint over content
    From:     divya manian
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0422.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0474.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0111.html
    Closed:   Rejected

    Issue 5.
    Summary:  Initial value currentcolor not defined
    From:     Christian Roth
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0015.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0016.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0019.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0480.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 6.
    Summary:  Example inconsistent with prose
    From:     Brian Manthos
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0368.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0369.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0370.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0383.html
    Closed:   Invalid / OutOfScope

    Issue 7.
    Summary:  Not defined how border curve breaks across lines
    From:     Sylvain Galineau
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0109.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0395.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 8.
    Summary:  border-image width numbers should refer to *computed* border-widths
    From:     Brad Kemper
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0065.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0066.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 9.
    Summary:  Clarify how background shorthand sets values to layers
    From:     Øyvind Stenhaug
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0387.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0478.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 10.
    Summary:  Add syntax to mark foreground images used as background images
    From:     Michael Cooper on behalf of PFWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-wai-pf/2010OctDec/0142.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/att-0356/css_response_from_pf.html

    Issue 11.
    Summary:  Reference WCAG 2.0 SC1.1.1 F3
    From:     Michael Cooper on behalf of PFWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0821.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0829.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Dec/att-0356/css_response_from_pf.html

    Issue 12.
    Summary:  border-image shorthand inconsistent with CSS2.1 informative grammar
    From:     Yves
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0078.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0405.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Nov/0484.html