# CSS Values and Units Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2016-09-29 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-values-3-20160929/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Drop 3-component syntax from <position> for disambiguation
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html ∈
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/90dad9ebbc6a/css-values-3/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0003.html ∈
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0052.html ∈

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  # multiplier is confused with *
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/381#issuecomment-301952385
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Add comma-optional list notation
    From:     Jarek Foksa
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385#issuecomment-243825038
    Closed:   Rejected in favor of [ foo+ ]# which is functionally equivalent
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html ∈

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  When to clamp negative calc() when negative lengths not allowed
    From:     Emilio
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/434
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/434#issuecomment-362787638
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f50df1824c8cfed895a63fb3b30baa0d73327a90
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0018.html ∈

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Ambiguous parsing of zero in <integer> | <length>
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/489
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b6b1b24b6cf0440adafd78ff5b9f1b65ecd26d7c
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ∈

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Duplicate References
    From:     Momdo
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/559
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/559#issuecomment-314914033
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Switch [...]! multiplier to ?? combinator
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687#issuecomment-310175183
    Closed:   Retracted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/687#event-1133504923

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Categorize high-res screens with low-res screens, not print.
    From:     Patrick Lauke
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-260529072
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0085.html ∈

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Undefined value of rem when no root element
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/936
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/936#issuecomment-290571695
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  url() missing from index
    From:     Praveeen Puglia
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1014
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f7f942e9672b199892ba76e7bad9d8242f389f4f
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Clarify interpretation of 0 inside calc()
    From:     Michael Giuffrida
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1114
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1114#issuecomment-287236248
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1024dc3fcd3ea9c8fb45dbec7406a6c80117b0d5
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  calc() divisors should support numeric expressions
    From:     Anthony Ramine
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1241
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1241#issuecomment-294843757
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ∈

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Was change intentional for print media with unusual viewing distances?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-302240095
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-303779713
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/708#issuecomment-312419658

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Restrict unitless 0 for angles to specific functions that need it
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0027.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0027.html ∈

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Consideration of scrollbars in viewport unit computation not implemented
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1766
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0014.html ∈

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  CSS2 and css-values conflict on empty url()s
    From:     Sam Sneddon
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2211
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2211#issuecomment-399200005
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0018.html ∈