# CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-05-24 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20180524/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Size contain shouldn't apply to tables
    From:     Morgan Rae Reschenberg
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395242022
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395256815
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-397009331

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  specified column/row sizes on grid containers should contribute to contain:size
    From:     Morgan Rae Reschenberg
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399291965
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399585146
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-400243568
    Closed:   Accepted / Editorial
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-402574020

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  `contain` may not want to be animatable
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  "scoped to an element" definition unused or unclear
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845#issuecomment-401319909
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Need clarification on layout containment & fragmentation
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840#issuecomment-401249631
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  'counter-increment' and 'content' property names should be linkified
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2800
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  contain:layout is a CB for fixpos/abspos descendants but doesn't establish a stacking context
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406716817
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406735520
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-407956323
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-408244344
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-409762755

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  containment vs baseline alignment
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411126837
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411371226
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-415094473

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Clarify spec text about ink-overflow
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3032
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-413883793
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-417016569

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  maybe 'contain-size' shouldn't apply to display:table-caption
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-408369314
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  containment probably shouldn't apply to most SVG elements
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410374314
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410385899
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410388088
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410809409
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-420710732
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-420710732