# CSS Cascading and Inheritance Level 4 Disposition of Comments for 2016-01-14 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-cascade-4-20160114/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-4/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    See also Level 3 Disposition of Comments: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-3/issues-cr-2016

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Confusion over 'revert'
    From:     Shane Stevens
    Comment:  Revert depending on rolling back cascading and inheritance is hard
    Response: It only affects the cascaded value, not the inherited value. Will clarify.
    Changes:
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: TPAC 2016
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Need precise definition of aliasing
    From:     Manish Goregaokar
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/866
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/866#issuecomment-399214678
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2ae2276b115ead42ab9d6a004ed4fb0152c4f6cc
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0907a7d4fa3bf4ed4578c4f4e6e483ea8d07cc55
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html ∈

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Define interaction of variables and animations
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1079
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1079#issuecomment-399216813
    Closed:   Deferred / OutOfScope
    Notes:    Seems more of a Variables issue.
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Define animating all property
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566#issuecomment-311222210
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566#issuecomment-311407951
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1566#issuecomment-311232731

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Elements in the flat tree don't have values
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1964
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2562
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2562#issuecomment-413772975
    Closed:   Deferred / OutOfScope