# CSS Flexible Box Layout Module Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2014-03-25 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140325/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Which size do percentage heights on flex items resolve against?
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0062.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0073.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editor's discretion

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Typos
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0090.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0091.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0100.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Excessive recalculation of free space
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0097.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0098.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0099.html
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Mishandling of zero free space
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0106.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0113.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Change 'flex' animatability to "yes, always"
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0169.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0175.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Use inline size for block-axis percentage padding
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0184.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0015.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0223.html
    Closed:   Retracted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0252.html

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths Take II
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0253.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0398.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0026.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0027.html
    Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
    Note:     Current spec has both variants available for review.

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Better handling of max-height on flex containers
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0292.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0293.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0294.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0297.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Regression in flex resolution algorithm
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0311.html
    Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0397.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: (In IRC)
    Resolved: Editor's discretion

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Missing negation in description of 'auto'
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0430.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0016.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Clarify impact of alignment properties on abspos items
    From:     Rossen Atanassov
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0043.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0380.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Roughly resolved at WG discussion at Seoul F2F

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Make 'flex-basis: auto' compute through to main size property value
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0046.html
    Note:     This was discussed earlier, see
              http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0029.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0192.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: WG member comment
    Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0056.html

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Editorial comments
    From:     Alan Stearns
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0057.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0195.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Editorial simplification of flex distribution step
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0169.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0197.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Min-height tweak to skip intrinsic aspect ratio items
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0177.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0011.html
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/53F3B6E3.50903@inkedblade.net
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Typo
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0424.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0425.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  min-size: auto rules should be main-axis specific
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0074.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0076.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  min-size: auto should reference 'width' only for flex-basis: auto
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0459.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0007.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion
    Open:     NEEDS MORE REVIEW

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Need keyword for 'auto' flex-basis, which no longer = max-content
    Proposal: Rename 'auto' to something else, make 'auto' the auto keyword.
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0008.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0051.html

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Cross-size of stretched flex size should be definite if flexbox is def
    From:     Rossen Atanassov
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0040.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Was already fixed in previous LC!
    Verified:

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  Advise authors to reorder focus order together with box order
    From:     PFWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0247.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0256.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Masonry effect
    From:     JK
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0046.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0053.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  More precise definition for stretched items.
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0455.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0456.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0458.html
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  Add flex-wrap: balance
    From:     Cory Brown
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0099.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0100.html
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  Better handling of main-axis percentages
    From:     John Rimmer
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0290.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0010.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 27. #
    Summary:  Intrinsic sizes vs. percentage children
    From:     fantasai and Tab Atkins
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0009.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0383.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014

    Issue 28. #
    Summary:  Clarify "any definite size constraints"
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0268.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0270.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0271.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0273.html

    Issue 29. #
    Summary:  Possible typo in main-size keyword conversion
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0125.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0274.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 30. #
    Summary:  Restrict min-size: auto overflow check to appropriate axis
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0317.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0319.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 31. #
    Summary:  Question wrt interaction of text wrapping and flex wrapping
    From:     Richard Dodd
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0395.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0440.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 32. #
    Summary:  What is the flexbox height when computed height is indefinite?
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0438.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0283.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 33. #
    Summary:  Shrinkwrapping of block-level flex containers undefined/suboptimal
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html

    Issue 34. #
    Summary:  Overflow directions should relate to content ordering
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0380.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0285.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Note:     Accepted edits into CSS Box Alignment instead.

    Issue 35. #
    Summary:  min-content default problematic for scroll root descendants
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0589.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0282.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified:

    Issue 36. #
    Summary:  Should intrinsic aspect ratio be considered?
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0609.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0616.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0042.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified:

    Issue 37. #
    Summary:  Error in application of intrinsic ratio
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0098.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0288.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified:

    Issue 38. #
    Summary:  Clarify non-application of ::first-line/::first-letter
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 39. #
    Summary:  max-content definition is wrong
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0277.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014

    Issue 40. #
    Summary:  Back-compat concerns with Issue 20 renaming of 'auto'
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0160.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0381.html
    Open:     Closed as no change for now, but requesting more feedback during LC.