# CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 3 (CSS3 UI) Disposition of Comments for 2015-07-07 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-ui-3-20150707/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-ui-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Markup error
    From:     Chris Rebert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0455.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0460.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Typos and grammer errors
    From:     Timeless
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0164.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0148.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Clarify hit-testing for the cursor-property
    From:     Chris Rebert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0010.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0005.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/pull/800#issuecomment-137299957
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0040.html

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Resize should apply to replaced elements
    From:     Elika Etemad
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0333.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0004.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0252.html

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Section titles do not match convention
    From:     Elika Etemad
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0299.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0072.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Missing context makes statement hard to understand
    From:     Elika Etemad
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0301.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0073.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  The combinators and multipliers within the syntaxes should link to the CSS Values module
    From:     Sebastian Zartner
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c0c700f9c8b29ba77a5861937a4097f2440ad1f2
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/147#issuecomment-223494303
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Add outline-offset to shorthand
    From:     Yoksel
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-244638068<Paste>
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/441#issuecomment-248137532
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Remove outline-color: invert
    From:     Chrishtr
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-242421803
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/423#issuecomment-265858664
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0079.html

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Should caret-color apply to any element?
    From:     Rego Casasnovas
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-263936054
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/725#issuecomment-264031876
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Allow annimation to/from caret-color:auto
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266428994
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-266952449
    Closed:   Retracted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/781#issuecomment-267304148
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Phrasing of computed value of caret-color ambiguous despite clear intent
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0123.html
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/741#issuecomment-275015837
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial