Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140325/
Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Module Level 1
Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Which size do percentage heights on flex items resolve against?
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0062.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0073.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Typos
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0090.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0091.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0100.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Excessive recalculation of free space
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0097.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0098.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0099.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Mishandling of zero free space
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0106.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0113.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Change 'flex' animatability to "yes, always"
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0169.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0175.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Use inline size for block-axis percentage padding
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0184.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0015.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0223.html
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0252.html
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Alternate wording for resolving flex lengths Take II
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0253.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0398.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0026.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0027.html
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
Note:     Current spec has both variants available for review.
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Better handling of max-height on flex containers
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0292.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0293.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0294.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0297.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0373.html
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Regression in flex resolution algorithm
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0311.html
Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0397.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: (In IRC)
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Missing negation in description of 'auto'
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Apr/0430.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0016.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Clarify impact of alignment properties on abspos items
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0043.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0380.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Roughly resolved at WG discussion at Seoul F2F
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Make 'flex-basis: auto' compute through to main size property value
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0046.html
Note:     This was discussed earlier, see
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jun/0029.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0192.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: WG member comment
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0056.html
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Editorial comments
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0057.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0195.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Editorial simplification of flex distribution step
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0169.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0197.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  Min-height tweak to skip intrinsic aspect ratio items
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0177.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0011.html
Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/53F3B6E3.50903@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Typo
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0424.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0425.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  min-size: auto rules should be main-axis specific
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0074.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0076.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  min-size: auto should reference 'width' only for flex-basis: auto
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0459.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0007.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
Open:     NEEDS MORE REVIEW
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Need keyword for 'auto' flex-basis, which no longer = max-content
Proposal: Rename 'auto' to something else, make 'auto' the auto keyword.
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0107.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0008.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0051.html
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Cross-size of stretched flex size should be definite if flexbox is def
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0040.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0012.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Was already fixed in previous LC!
Verified: 
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  Advise authors to reorder focus order together with box order
From:     PFWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0247.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0256.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Masonry effect
From:     JK
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0046.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0053.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  More precise definition for stretched items.
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0455.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0456.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0458.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  Add flex-wrap: balance
From:     Cory Brown
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0099.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0100.html
Closed:   Deferred
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Better handling of main-axis percentages
From:     John Rimmer
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0290.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0010.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 27.
Summary:  Intrinsic sizes vs. percentage children
From:     fantasai and Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0009.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0383.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 28.
Summary:  Clarify "any definite size constraints"
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0053.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0268.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0270.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0271.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0273.html
----
Issue 29.
Summary:  Possible typo in main-size keyword conversion
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0125.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0274.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 30.
Summary:  Restrict min-size: auto overflow check to appropriate axis
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0317.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0319.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 31.
Summary:  Question wrt interaction of text wrapping and flex wrapping
From:     Richard Dodd
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0395.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0440.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 32.
Summary:  What is the flexbox height when computed height is indefinite?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0438.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0283.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 33.
Summary:  Shrinkwrapping of block-level flex containers undefined/suboptimal
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
----
Issue 34.
Summary:  Overflow directions should relate to content ordering
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0380.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0285.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Accepted edits into CSS Box Alignment instead.
----
Issue 35.
Summary:  min-content default problematic for scroll root descendants
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0589.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0282.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified:
----
Issue 36.
Summary:  Should intrinsic aspect ratio be considered?
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0609.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0616.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0042.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified:
----
Issue 37.
Summary:  Error in application of intrinsic ratio
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0098.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0288.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified:
----
Issue 38.
Summary:  Clarify non-application of ::first-line/::first-letter
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0099.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 39.
Summary:  max-content definition is wrong
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0277.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: by CSSWG at Sophia F2F Sept 2014
----
Issue 40.
Summary:  Back-compat concerns with Issue 20 renaming of 'auto'
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0160.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0381.html
Open:     Closed as no change for now, but requesting more feedback during LC.
----
