# CSS Counter Styles Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-06-11 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/CR-css-counter-styles-3-20150611/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-counter-styles-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Minor Comments
    From:     timeless
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0054.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0009.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Armenian Typo
    From:     Yifán Wáng
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0247.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0052.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Typo in "Accumulating Numerals"
    From:     Martin Janecke
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0086.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0008.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  “in the document language” imprecise
    From:     Richard Ishida
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0258.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Sep/0055.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1845
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1845#issuecomment-340053939
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0034.html ∈

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Error in trad-chinese-formal description
    From:     Momdo Nakamura
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0088.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jan/0112.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Require --prefix for counter styles?
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0267.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0277.html ∈
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Compute missing counter styles to 'decimal'
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0076.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0082.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1616
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0034.html ∈

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Why remove upper-greek?
    From:     Athanasios Viennas
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0220.html ∈
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/135
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Previous CSSWG Resolution

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Additive tuples of the same declaration with the same weight undefined
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Invalid values make rule invalid instead of declaration
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1220#issuecomment-315933860

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Are none/decimal/system/fallback invalid in @counter-style or excluded from <counter-style-name>?
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1285
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1285#issuecomment-296700102
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1285#issuecomment-296965383
    Response:
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Exclude 'none' from <counter-style-name>
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1295
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1295#issuecomment-298109476
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0023.html ∈

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Do not use CSS parser for CSSCounterStyleRule::name
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1325
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1325#issuecomment-300029288
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion (based on precedent / consistency)

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Make 'disc' not overridable
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1521
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1521#issuecomment-309565094
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0039.html ∈

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Invalid @counter-style should still exist in CSSOM
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1682
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1682#issuecomment-320540196
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1682#issuecomment-335868951
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0025.html ∈

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Mark <image> in <symbol> at risk
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1991
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1991#issuecomment-349822315
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0011.html ∈

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Change cjk-eartly-branch and cjk-heavenly-stem to fixed
    From:     c933103
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2096
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2096#issuecomment-563495201
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion