# CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2014-09-25 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Use preferred size instead of max-content size
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0424.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative
    From:     Alan Stearns
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0268.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Editorial nits
    From:     Alan Stearns
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0431.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0191.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Error in stretch definition
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Alias no-wrap to nowrap
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Error in flex container max-content definition
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead
    From:     Rossen Atanassov
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html
    Followup: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative
    From:     Addison Phillips
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa
    From:     Addison Phillips
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Why are there sheep?
    From:     Addison Phillips
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  'flex' section needs editorial love
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Stray references to old spec prose
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  'order' should affect speech/navigation order
    From:     Bo Campbell
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Note:     WG still open to further discussion on solving the relevant concerns,
              will follow up

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Forced flex line breaking controls
    From:     Glen Huang
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html
    Closed:   Deferred

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  Spec conflicts with itself on interpretation of break controls
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0349.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0263.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  Blink refuses to implement percentage-margin change
    From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
    Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
    Open
    Note:     Issue noted, pending later discussion

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Definite flexed size requires definite flex container main size
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0022.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Clarify that flex base size doesn't include min/max clamping
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0377.html
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0428.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  Clarify whether layout is required for min/max-content sizing.
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0049.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0044.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Should justify-self:stretch compute to flex-start, or just act like it?
    From:     Javier Fernandez
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0247.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Note:     Filed against CSS Align

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  Static position of an abspos child of a flex container is confusingly defined
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0137.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0047.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  min-width:auto shouldn't take definite flex-basis into account
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0038.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0063.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  Some "flex basis" links are wrong
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0534.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0264.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial