# CSS Scroll Snap Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2017-12-14 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-css-scroll-snap-1-20171214/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Sentence about transforms vs scroll-margin unclear
    From:     Sandra Yunjia Sun
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2214
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2214#issuecomment-361447047
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/3f426e4d53db089f6dec9dc4f19eed6218e315e0
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  scroll-snap-align values assigned backwards
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2232
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4e24ba8f657af52f5345550fa9fb2abcea30945a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion based on previous resolutions

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Path to Interop
    From:     Majid Valipour
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2523
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2523#issuecomment-381219197
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2523#issuecomment-381223985

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Clarify interaction between mandatory strictness and visibility req
    From:     Majid Valipour
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2526
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2526#issuecomment-380370805
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2526#issuecomment-399242018
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/244c3cdba734943db9c8eef404a342047a14c683
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2526#issuecomment-410377933

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Interaction of scroll snapping and scrollIntoView()
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2593
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2593#issuecomment-385099549
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e84ea2ebdc7087df1ec3d19baeee3a8fcc9494bf
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0004.html ∈

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Why doesn't scroll-snap-type allow per-axis snapping?
    From:     JonJohnJohnson
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2728
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2728#issuecomment-395859327
    Closed:   ???? (Can't tell if this is Rejected/Deferred or just a Question)
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Add scroll-padding: auto to account for UA heuristics
    From:     Hazel Seanor
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2929
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2929#issuecomment-407570328
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9e4d46510d3fe00eb2af8f92246023e87be0d33d
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0000.html ∈