# CSS Text Decoration Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-08-01 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-css-text-decor-3-20130801/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-decor-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Allow UA to skip ink by default
    From:     Edward O'Connor
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/m2iositu9t.fsf@eoconnor.apple.com ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0088.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-337748467
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/776c8197d091/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0069.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727#issuecomment-338185006

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  text-decoration-color doesn't handle SVG fills
    From:     Tavmjong Bah
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/1400592192.22096.52.camel@localhost.localdomain ⎆
    Response:
    Closed:   Deferred to FXTF Paint
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Allow specifying position and thickness of underlines
    From:     Lea Verou
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/9500A3A5-957D-462D-B30C-E5C548ADEB0E@verou.me ⎆
    Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/53BE565D.5090905@inkedblade.net ⎆
    Closed:   Deferred to L4
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Allow arbitrary decorations
    From:     Sebastian Zartner
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAERejNbMCrZiBbCSRjA_1mZ3qOZyQ9PTDoH+TxvX4gp_2eSnpg@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB-xMb46nMf3piNNU_fcyry0hUoKh=WfPmZma3CA=c8Gg@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Closed:   Rejected
    Note:     Proposal is way ahead of its time; use cases may be addressed in
              future specs, unknown as yet which ones.
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  text-shadow should apply to inline images
    From:     Axel Dahmen
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/maatmk$bq8$1@ger.gmane.org ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0087.html ∈
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Don't underline leading/trailing spaces
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/3A25BF98-130D-43F1-A883-90EAC8EDECB5@rivoal.net ⎆
    Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/dad5fcc900d7/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3u5pTm7eTDQ-skjhfMA6nfHSewvnrtoYOxXVSj22HxXKw@mail.gmail.com ⎆

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Error in computed value of 'text-shadow'
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20150326151542.GA19304@pescadero.dbaron.org ⎆
    Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDB9UDyk+8v53t5kDjcTsJZJ0E8BFa5RPn3nYqh1=0VgtA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/fe04a357105875cf26b30bf9375c8b310a517524
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  s/above/outside/ for emphasis marks
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698Cn7Yg5+bQO8NN1YrnpZak_yXQVYRc8HUQB3OB0_x9RA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/E1CA333C-15C7-44F5-BDA1-23BBF16E5DE5@gmail.com ⎆
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9432fa2c1e8e80418bcd30538a739854d39a7bd
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Clarify position of emphasis marks over auto-hidden ruby
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0193.html ∈
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0230.html ∈
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0116.html ∈
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Apr/0020.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0036.html ∈
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/cbcdad5472a0
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/a11c1f2e8f39
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: =WG= Resolve.
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0037.html ∈
    Notes:    See follow-up in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1918

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Clarify whether emphasis marks are upright or sideways for sideways-rl/lr
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0285.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0089.html ∈
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/d895ae89479b/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  UA rules for text-emphasis-position should handle Japanese within Chinese
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0311.html ∈
    Response: https://www.w3.org/mid/5654DED1.8070706@inkedblade.net ⎆
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/51a999522cc2
    Closed:   Accepted =i18n= Review
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Are there emphasis mark position preferences for Korean?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/5654DED1.8070706@inkedblade.net ⎆
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/20
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/klreq/issues/20#issuecomment-337779644
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/22c74858f801
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Should emphasis marks use 'font-variant: ruby'?
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq69_efU_tobZe8VDYfM9qCm0ejpiajmmys5JW4h8=oAx4Lg@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0111.html ∈
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/22ed0ceb4192652bcee96c139326acb742b1d868
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  'text-emphasis' shorthand should not allow only <color>
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699grzUvrZHMHW17bFCE-CamQmfeGgOHN-tB4ViKsWtqTA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699ztveczAWh1nYZekBoNFUKVz2LCiUUigUSuxV+CuT6HA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0355.html ∈
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈
    Verified: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-10-18/#e893598

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Emphasis marks per typographic character unit
    From:     Richard Ishida
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/5652E04D.6080408@w3.org ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0084.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Emphasis marks shouldn't apply to punctuation
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq699v=qhkpXD8smpV0TSOW_GEt67Z4HZWmTheqhv2n+=ekw@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0083.html ∈
    Followup: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/839
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Mar/0021.html ∈
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  'text-emphasis-position' requires too many arguments
    From:     Momdo Nakamura
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/20151215203411.4682.EDA4FE4B@gmail.com ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0118.html ∈
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/49463814bb5b/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  'text-underline-position' should default to 'auto' for CJK, to avoid compat issues
    From:     Masayuki Nakano
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/55506D67.7060308@d-toybox.com ⎆
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/5C756B1C-F03B-4CA7-8796-7A6EEBC34C32@apple.com ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0144.html ∈
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7ca2e5cf82ddb73a8e58484eeee21750fd32d2e
              https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/6b29859a1ce2/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  'text-underline-position' UA rules don't handle non-CJK inside CJK
    From:     Myles Maxfield
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0210.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0092.html ∈
    Changes:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0094.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Module needs update to handle new sideways-lr/sideways-rl writing modes
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/56E86D82.10606@inkedblade.net ⎆
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Dec/0119.html ∈
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/aa9ae9847dcff26d80f2b4d097e0f13781f25a44
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Specify interaction of text-decoration, text-emphasis, and ruby
    From:     Momdo Nakamura
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMdq698GTMUd=OBrgaFLcNYWhMdmOtaYa6D-8OrGSbxZZDaibw@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f205ff9dc6b969d015aa37c710b32d3845f137c9
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: =WG= Review.

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  CJK vs. skipping ink
    From:     Koji Ishii
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/707
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  ???
    From:     Christoph Päper
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/799#issuecomment-290461207
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  line-throughs vs. skipping ink
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/711#issuecomment-268594411
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6d37258d4696972886a18f2298488cf94800060a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vcLHbfAhsZi8OCT+kuQOuxt_qH4rimVTewkvNR=SUi=Q@mail.gmail.com ⎆

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  Position of underline should depend on skipped things
    From:     Dave Hyatt
    Comment:  https://www.w3.org/mid/3ADFB47B-FE63-4820-A602-D3BABFF6126F@apple.com ⎆
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  text-decoration-skip should have keyword for complex initial value
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/727
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/843
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0049.html ∈

    Issue 27. #
    Summary:  underline-becoming-line-through note is confusing
    From:     Hiroshi Sakakibara
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-224203512
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/160#issuecomment-269328826
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0ff76a5ed7ce0e6de7c17ec4b7a357f56fcab3f0
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 28. #
    Summary:  Initial value of text-shadow should be 'currentColor'
    From:     Jonathan Kew
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/942
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/942#issuecomment-281751272
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/22897f99b2ac/css-text-decor/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0088.html ∈

    Issue 29. #
    Summary:  'text-underline-position: under' using font metrics conflicts with Arabic/Tibetan
    From:     Richard Ishida
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1055
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1055#issuecomment-337752816
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: i18n telecon 2018-02-18

    Issue 30. #
    Summary:  ink skipping should conform to glyph shapes
    From:     Toby Reif
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-340963541
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/904e554cc193e11ff9338f7d1a3fa0995821dcd7
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0044.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-339621321
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1093#issuecomment-364610333

    Issue 31. #
    Summary:  interaction of 'display: contents' and text-decoration
    From:     Loirooriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/b695de85d22b
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 32. #
    Summary:  Text decoration shouldn't skip Ethiopic word space
    From:     Richard Ishida
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1146
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1146#issuecomment-337783678
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 33. #
    Summary:  Cross-reference 'text-underline-position' from 'text-decoration-line'
    From:     Richard Ishida
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1178
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1178#issuecomment-337790860
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/7baf02b2c7e3
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 34. #
    Summary:  Questions about `text-emphasis-position`
    From:     Richard Ishida
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1207
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1207#issuecomment-337791679
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 35. #
    Summary:  text-shadow canonical order doesn't match impls
    From:     Anthony Ramine
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1485
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1485#issuecomment-318728810
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/5683d7ffe07b
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 36. #
    Summary:  List Mongolian as `text-underline-position: under right`
    From:     Koji Ishii
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0405.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/type-samples/issues/58

    Issue 37. #
    Summary:  Describe text-decoration-style before -color.
    From:     Dennis Heuer
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jan/0066.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 38. #
    Summary:  Add spelling-error and grammar-error styling to text-decoration
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1828
    Closed:   Deferred to (and accepted in) L4
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0012.html ∈