# CSS Fragmentation Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-01-29 LCWD

Dated Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css3-break-20150129/

Editor's Draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-break/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Clarify slicing requirements for monolithic elements
    From:     Håkon Wium Lie
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/21703.26184.790775.276339@opera.com
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0233.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified:

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Slicing/pushing of replaced content should be controllable
    From:     Håkon Wium Lie, Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0535.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0233.html
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
    Verified:

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Replace ASCII diagrams with SVG
    From:     Doug Schepers
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/54FC11AE.9040209@w3.org
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0251.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Address line-breaking controls
    From:     Brad Kemper
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0172.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0173.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Note:     Handled in CSS Text Level 4
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0186.html
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0205.html

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Grammatical errors
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0380.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0214.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Confusion on break types wrt nested flows
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0382.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0218.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Name of 'any' is confusing
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0383.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0305.html
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0037.html
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Multiple principal boxes problematic
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0391.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0215.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editor's discretion
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Page progression undefined
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0392.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0216.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Multiple avoidances
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0394.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0217.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0228.html
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Breaking rules too specifically defined
    From:     Brady Duga
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0395.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0229.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2015Sep/0015.html

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Generated content at breaks
    From:     Sanders Kleinfeld
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0102.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0231.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0232.html
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: Editor's Discretion
    Verified:

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  box-decoration-break and margins
    From:     Håkon Wium Lie
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0051.html
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0072.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0230.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
    Verified:

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Drop cloned margins/padding/border if running out of space
    From:     Rossen Atanassov
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0279.html
    Verified: Reporter is spec editor

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Should widows/orphans really have priority over break-* controls?
    From:     fantasai
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0009.html
    Verified: Reporter is spec editor

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Clarify effect of 'box-decoration-break' on Shapes and Masking
    From:     Dirk Schulze
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0099.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0223.html
    Response: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/7d694dd2d77a/css-break/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Parallel flows independence is too strong
    From:     Peter Moulder
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0158.html
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0353.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0013.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: =WG= Discuss

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  Editorial nits
    From:     Peter Moulder
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0170.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0148.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  CSS Fragmentation should absorb CSSOM details for fragmented boxes
    From:     Alan Stearns
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0140.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0154.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Shorthand expansion into longhands breaks getPropertyCSSValue
    From:     Peter Moulder
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0157.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0149.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor's discretion

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Breaks within inline-blocks
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0227.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0133.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0134.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  Clarify that fragments have border-boxes
    From:     Robert O'Callahan
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Dec/0465.html
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0071.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Guaranteeing progress
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0146.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0153.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0085.html

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  Prefix 'page' and 'column' and 'region' break keywords with 'force-*'
    From:     Theresa O'Connor
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0037.html
    Closed:   Retracted
    Resolved: TPAC 2015