# CSS Scroll Snapping Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2016-10-20 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-scroll-snap-1-20161020/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-scroll-snap-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Examples and syntax of scroll-snap-type conflict
    From:     Wenson Hsieh
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/827
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/827#issuecomment-269347510
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7a20d00238aac3ddbdd8d5dd7e74ff81dd29ba76
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Clarify that css-scroll-snap doesn't dictate any particular input method
    From:     Benoit Girard
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1305
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1305#issuecomment-301600041
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9760282d421c772b0e08b745149b8f7d21208ff1
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1305#issuecomment-301938166

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Specify how scroll-padding expands out
    From:     Peter Linss
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1050
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1050#issuecomment-301591832
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1050#issuecomment-302840914
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1050#issuecomment-309578167
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/38caa2ee20ca9833a1ad401b03c96debcac0cc21
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1050#issuecomment-309591432
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1050#issuecomment-311517366

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Should negative scroll-padding be allowed
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1084
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1084#issuecomment-302153089
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8158a651b75e81db6dcbdffd17c91e3edb81de5d
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: CSSWG Telecon 2017-05-17
    Verified: Reporter is editor

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Clarify how visibility requirement makes snap x/y snap positions interdependent
    From:     Majid Valipour
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/950
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/950#issuecomment-301597661
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/diff/ae445d9c2266/css-scroll-snap/Overview.bs
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  scroll-snap-stop definition not quite right
    From:     Majid Valipour
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1552
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1552#issuecomment-315480315
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09eac571148d01e1089a2b35c6293de0a3d605aa
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Telecon 2017-07-19

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  scroll-snap-stop definition implies applying to scroll container instead of snap position
    From:     fantasai
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/256fa4d967add46f0c8b09987ed0b7970526473d
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: reporter is editor

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Add pageup/pagedown to
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1605
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/098d2032876fdcd3cf2078bf0393e207b3e4b220
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Telecon 2017-07-19