# CSS Styling Attributes Disposition of Comments

Last call document:http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-css-style-attr-20100121/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-style-attr/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected/OutOfScope/Invalid + verified
- Rejected and not verified
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified
- Formal Objection (There were no formal objections.)

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1.
    Summary:  Use term "inline style" somewhere to be consistent with HTML 4
    From:     Ingo Chao
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0507.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0187.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0196.html

    Issue 2.
    Summary:  Specify inline styles' specificity
    From:     Ingo Chao
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jan/0508.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0188.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0197.html

    Issue 3.
    Summary:  Unclear that comment token convention is normative
    From:     SVGWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #2
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html

    Issue 4.
    Summary:  Unclear that delimiting braces are excluded from style attribute syntax
    From:     SVGWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #4
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html

    Issue 5.
    Summary:  CSS2.1 parsing rules exclude CSS3 properties
    From:     SVGWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #6
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope // CSS2.1
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html

    Issue 6.
    Summary:  CSS2.1 parsing rules exclude SVG properties
    From:     SVGWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0041.html #7
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0191.html
    Closed:   Invalid // or OutOfScope -> CSS2.1?
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html

    Issue 7.
    Summary:  Allow scientific notation in CSS properties
    From:     SVGWG
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0469.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0473.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0493.html