# CSS Fragmentation Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2016-01-14 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-break-3-20160114/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-break-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Clarify application of widows and orphans
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1823
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1823#issuecomment-335868256
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0025.html ∈

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Clarify break propagation
    From:     claytron5000
    Comment:  https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-384413748
    Response: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-385836225
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2614
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fa5bc2b61b56
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0029.html ∈

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Fix applies-to lines for break-*
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1904
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1904#issuecomment-414395314
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/23d5a4c7b28f9767f7f7a621a7b895d4b858bbca
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0023.html ∈

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Clarify how inline-block may be not monolithic
    From:     Koji Ishii
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1111#issuecomment-420640993

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Ruby containers are not monolithic
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1474
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1474#issuecomment-414397077
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Define empty fragment at fragmentainer boundary to stay on previous
    From:     Morten Stenshorne
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1529
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1529#issuecomment-415592931
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0023.html ∈

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Clarify Element.getClientRects()
    From:     Koji Ishii
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1545
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1545#issuecomment-414404715
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7f6b96445a4a5b60c80c816af4719e58cc2acb09#diff-83c5030d93d2408c7cf139946d26016e
    Closed:   Accepted / Retracted
    Verified:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1545#issuecomment-420639645

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Clarify aliasing mechanisms
    From:     Manish Goregaokar
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/866
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/866#issuecomment-399214678
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/316eb3768307e0bf976c1b956420f597fab92d22
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html ∈

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Update Animation type lines to new format
    From:     Brian Birtles
    Comment:  [source lost]
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8dbce74efa894eb8c7183440bd312316cb1ce449#diff-83c5030d93d2408c7cf139946d26016e
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Clarify applicability of box-decoration-break to non-fragmentation breaks
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1706
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1706#issuecomment-420474512
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Sep/0016.html ∈

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Clarify fragmentation of block margins at start/end of container
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3073
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3073#issuecomment-430413829
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8c875f0ec522aad17aa6a6aae2bc6d9472dc1c8f
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Nov/0003.html ∈
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Nov/0003.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3073#issuecomment-438814049