Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

Issue 1.
Summary:  Clarify "no namespace"
From:     Christof Hoeke
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0148.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0191.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Clarify validity / semantics of empty string namespace declarations.
From:     Christof Hoeke
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0148.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Feb/0199.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Example numbering off
From:     Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0128.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0135.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Change order requirements for @namespace
From:     Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0129.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0133.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0136.html
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0158.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Concerns about asterisk definitions
From:     Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0130.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0134.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0139.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0155.html
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Conflict in application of default namespace
From:     Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0131.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0141.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Add example of non-matching prefixes denoting the same expanded name
From:     Erik Dahlstrom, on behalf of SVGWG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0132.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0142.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0154.html
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Remove default namespaces feature / Add note explaining impact on selectors
From:     Steven Pemberton, on behalf of XHTML2WG
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0153.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0188.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0279.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0283.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0344.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0345.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0346.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0348.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0349.html
Closed:   Rejected (to remove namespace feature)
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0384.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0034.html
          http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0037.html
Closed:   Accepted (to add note instead)
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0299.html
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Clarify empty string namespaces
From:     Anne van Kesteren
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2008Mar/0015.html
Testcase: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0391.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0396.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0431.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
