# CSS Flexible Box Module Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2017-10-19 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-css-flexbox-1-20171019/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Move min-width/min-height: auto definitions to css-sizing
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1920#issuecomment-342008468
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2103#issuecomment-360955736
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Dec/0004.html ∈

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Choose single option for resolving margin/padding percentages
    From:     Rossen Atanassov
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2085#issuecomment-362000362
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/db68ee43e752fabf68fd1e776a0ac840f4d3e971
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html ∈

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  When does min-width/min-height: auto compute to auto vs zero?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2230
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cf709be33562b27fddd4200824d876378f47fe6d
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Feb/0000.html ∈

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Make min-width: auto compute to auto always, resolve to zero as needed
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-362114572
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-365688138
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2248#issuecomment-370625542

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Min-content sizing too smart to be web compatible
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2353#issuecomment-378742623
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0041.html ∈

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Make order do semantic reordering
    From:     Robert Utasi
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371528202
    ???:      https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2405#issuecomment-371590054
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: previous CSSWG resolutions, Web platform architectural principles, etc.

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Use more formal language in note
    From:     Nadya678
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2431#issuecomment-372120318
    Closed:   Accepted
    Changes:  (note was removed entirely due to issue 2)

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Clarify interaction of table flex items and sizing algorithm
    From:     Morten Stenshorne
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2442
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2442#issuecomment-385829501
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Interaction of table wrapper box and flex sizing
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2604
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2604#issuecomment-385824058
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2604#issuecomment-398896174

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Clarify break propagation
    From:     claytron5000
    Comment:  https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-384413748
    Response: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7958#issuecomment-385836225
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2614
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fa5bc2b61b56
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0029.html ∈

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Add a note to explain flex values < 1
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2617
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cfdc4a228acbabd1c4a7bda9ea467ae858396301
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Floor outer sizes where needed
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2655
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2655#issuecomment-415902551
    Closed:   Retracted (no changes to flexbox, only grid)
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Bidi vs anonymous wrappers
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2702
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2702#issuecomment-393706915
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Clarifications to size computation dependencies
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2890
    Open:     Pending deeper investigation, scope of edits unknown

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Does overflow change the baseline on flex items?
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2902
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2902#issuecomment-407576395
    Closed:   Invalid
    Notes:    Resulted in bugfix to css-align-3 wrt inline-block, no changes to flexbox

    Issue 16. #
    Summary: Investigate applying align-content to single-line flex containers
    From:    Tab Atkins and fantasai
    Comment: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3052
    Open:    Pending Web-compat investigation