# CSS Flexible Box Layout Disposition of Comments for 2016-05-26 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160526/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Scrollable overflow vs alignment
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0107.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0109.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Notes:    Fixed in css-align-3
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ea5c14795ccf05786ab1b1c45e80d7c9d4841bdf
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Add property for switching keyboarding order DOM vs flex order
    From:     Léonie Watson
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0119.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0123.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0124.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0125.html ∈
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Notes:    Refiled on css-ui-4 as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1764
    Notes:    See previous discussions on a11y vs layout reordering e.g.
              https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html ∈
              and
              https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#flow-order
              https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#order-accessibility

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  min-height vs border-box sizing
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0163.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0164.html ∈
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jun/0173.html ∈

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Add justify-content: space-evenly
    From:     Bejamin Strauß
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0034.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0035.html ∈
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Notes:    Already added through CSS Box Alignment module.

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Percentage margins for intrinsic sizing
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Jul/0061.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/359 (duped to 347)
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/347#issuecomment-319662029
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0036.html ∈

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Definiteness of flex items’ main size depending on flex-basis
    From:     Sam Sneddon
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jan/0068.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-324140324
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0026.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-327643730
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1679#issuecomment-327828487

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Spec lists incorrect initial value for 'flex'
    From:     xgq frms
    From:     philix
    From:     raphaelgoetter
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0030.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0034.html ∈
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/183#issuecomment-227652791
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/634#issuecomment-255542169
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Notes:    =TF= Follow up to OP once update hits /TR

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Flexbox spec currently has "Printer" as its title
    From:     dholbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/182#issuecomment-225712448
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  block-axis baselines
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/197#issuecomment-248331296
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Nov/0076.html ∈

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  More precise definition of baseline-alignment sizing impact
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237375117
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/372#issuecomment-237377783

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Intrinsic Sizing Algo forgets to clamp by min size
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/361#issuecomment-280448350
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: =biesi= Review.

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  'auto' keyword missing from flex-basis
    From:     p2227
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#issuecomment-233586411
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/329#event-728412033

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  baseline-alignment fallback should be start not flex-start
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/332#issuecomment-277107165
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: reporter is editor

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Error in axis-mapping table
    From:     funorpain
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/205
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/29e6b0adab5cc559202f7fd321c620b17e6046b1
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Absolute ratio flex impossible with margins/padding
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/316
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0036.html ∈
    Verified: Reporter is editor

    Issue 16A. #
    Summary:  Baselines of empty boxes and other cases of baseline synthesis
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-242863486
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/373#issuecomment-244829198
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0000.html ∈

    Issue 16B. #
    Summary:  Baselines of empty boxes
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/439#issuecomment-246571933
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0028.html ∈

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Error in example: s/align-content/align-self/
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/436
    Closed:   Accepted
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e377000a95363800f3d945358aee80eea2daade6
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  Static position not following hypothetical position loses use cases
    From:     jlukic
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401#issuecomment-286486848
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/401#issuecomment-288471456
    Closed:   Objection
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0072.html ∈

    Issue 19A. #
    Summary:  Computing out align-self auto is problematic
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244791183
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-244824005
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-247595259
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0041.html ∈

    Issue 19B. #
    Summary:  Why changing static position when align-self: auto?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-268110480
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-280459999
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html ∈

    Issue 19C. #
    Summary:  Ambiguous lookup for align-self: auto
    From:     Emilio
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-281680347
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/440#issuecomment-282097463
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Flex properties applying to table wrapper box
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-277108563
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/547#issuecomment-278414959
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/948#issuecomment-277320547
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0046.html ∈

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Errors in update to align-self: auto
    From:     Javier Fernandez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/644
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  Define 'align-content: space-between' for one line in multiline flex
    From:     markbrown
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/718#issuecomment-263037457
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Typo
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/792#issuecomment-280439482
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  Missing terminology definitions for flex container axes
    From:     Sam Sneddon
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280451297
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/981#issuecomment-280456508

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  Baseline alignment using visual or logical “first” item?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-281750174
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/995#issuecomment-282100035
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Mar/0001.html ∈

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  Computed values seem wrong
    From:     Javier Fernandez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1095
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1095#issuecomment-292630500
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 27. #
    Summary:  Flex and Grid images size differently
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-321915494
    Closed:   Retracted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1112#issuecomment-322848926

    Issue 28. #
    Summary:  Implementations don't match flex container intrinsic main sizes algo
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147#issuecomment-290523764
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1147#issuecomment-327625337

    Issue 29. #
    Summary:  Partial Implementations of align-self values
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1167
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1167#issuecomment-292621161
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/55a77e02361725b3b00347fce599d48eea7136af
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0046.html ∈

    Issue 30. #
    Summary:  Missing cross-links
    From:     Fuqiao Xue
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1230
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1230#issuecomment-315931608
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 31. #
    Summary:  Single line multi-line flex containers don't obey align-content
    From:     yisibl
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268#issuecomment-296102175
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1268#issuecomment-296143738

    Issue 32. #
    Summary:  flex-shrink with nested flex containers
    From:     François Remy
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290#issuecomment-297150175
    Closed:   Retracted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1290#event-1067611869

    Issue 33. #
    Summary:  Stack level of static flex/grid items with z-index
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312#issuecomment-298202507
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1312#issuecomment-298202507

    Issue 34. #
    Summary:  Non-interop with shrinking and growing images
    From:     Jen Simmons
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1322
    Open
    Note:     Being deferred to next editing cycle to allow more in-depth discussion.
    Note:     Be sure to file testcases

    Issue 35. #
    Summary:  Control over spacing between flex items
    From:     Keith Grant
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1324#issuecomment-311176689
    Closed:   Deferred to L2
    Notes:    See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/592
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 36. #
    Summary:  Improve definition linking for max-content contributions
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1419
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1419#issuecomment-315930973
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 37. #
    Summary:  Empty flex items contribute 0 even with specified size
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1435
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0026.html ∈

    Issue 38. #
    Summary:  'order' should not apply to abspos children of a flexbox
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1439#issuecomment-315929444
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0351.html ∈

    Issue 39. #
    Summary:  ::before/::after as flex items
    From:     Cameron McCormack
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1591
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1591#issuecomment-314351468
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 40. #
    Summary:  Changes list links to outdated spec prose in other modules
    From:     SelenIT
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-314877117
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1595#issuecomment-315925684
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 41. #
    Summary:  Confusing wording in accessibility note
    From:     Tantek Çelik
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677#issuecomment-319906682
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1677#issuecomment-320231369

    Issue 42. #
    Summary:  Intrinsic sizing with ∑flex < 1 is broken
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-329218845
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-331318337
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332259616
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-332671797
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Oct/0012.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1735#issuecomment-334855598

    Issue 43. #
    Summary:  Rename “Implied Minimum Size” section to “Automatic Minimum Size”
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1780#issuecomment-327593455
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 44. #
    Summary:  Confusion over content size vs transferred size of images.
    From:     AmeliaBR
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/694#issuecomment-315920507
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Note:     Refiled as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1609

    Issue 45. #
    Summary:  Clarify sentence construction in finding max-content flex fraction
    From:     Alan Stearns
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1803#issuecomment-329247658
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 46. #
    Summary:  Restore deleted def for auto min size w/o specified size or aspect ratio
    From:     Shing Lyu
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/671
    Response: https://github.com/shinglyu/csswg-drafts/commit/7d64cfb5c3ad1cabacc3e0d00f72c3717d2a1ef3
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix