# CSS Fonts Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-07-11 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-fonts-3-20130711/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-fonts/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0427.html
    definition of same-origin restriction for font loading is contradictory
    Raised By: Anne van Kesteren
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0299.html
    Fixed in:
    https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/8d1905d1c3cf
    https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/9905e92b4df5
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0307.html
    Impact: clarification, no impact on existing implementations (Firefox, IE)

    Issue 2

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0686.html
    letter-spacing, font-variant-ligatures and font feature precedence
    Raised By: fantasai
    Resolution: shift the relative precedence of features implied by other CSS properties to be higher than 'font-variant'
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/368c6ad02232
    Group response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0110.html
    Impact: no effect on implementations (Firefox font-variant experimental implementation behind pref), no effect on existing content

    Issue 3

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0235.html
    editorial: political joke in one of the examples
    Raised By: Sergey Malkin
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0251.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/1bd7f210c461
    No response from commenter.

    Issue 4a

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0239.html
    definition of 'auto' value of 'font-size-adjust' is misleading
    Raised By: Vladimir Levantovsky
    Resolution: drop 'auto' value, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0614.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/1c284112685e
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0624.html
    Impact: no implementation of 'auto' value for 'font-size-adjust' (Firefox implements <number> values)

    Issue 4b

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0239.html
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0498.html
    adjusted font size needs to affect line height
    Raised By: Vladimir Levantovsky
    Resolution: font-size-adjust affects used font-size not computed font-size, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0614.html
    Resolution: add an informative note for authors regarding line height, per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0614.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/1c284112685e
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0624.html
    Impact: clarification based on existing behavior

    Issue 5

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0239.html
    editorial: examples should use WOFF fonts rather than TrueType fonts
    Raised By: Vladimir Levantovsky
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0252.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/dbd4337ff7d7
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0267.html

    Issue 6

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0472.html
    question: testcases for CSS available for use in SVG tests?
    Raised By: Cameron McCormack
    Addressed by:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0477.html
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0664.html
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0021.html

    Issue 7

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0473.html
    whether 'font-feature-settings: "kern" off' disables kerning from old-style kern table
    Raised By: Jonathan Kew
    Addressed by: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0478.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/9c4ae1da9e9a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0522.html
    Impact: clarification based on existing behavior

    Issue 8

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0585.html
    'ordinal' value of 'font-variant-numeric' should be moved to 'font-variant-position'
    Raised By: fantasai
    Resolution: reword description slightly, otherwise no change, per rationale in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Aug/0657.html
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/6b6b4d9a7766
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0028.html

    I18N Issue 287

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0256.html
    i18n-ISSUE-287: Figure 4 - combining diacritics
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: deferred to next level, add more examples of complex text usage in L4
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 288

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0257.html
    i18n-ISSUE-288: Letterform differences
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 289

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0258.html
    i18n-ISSUE-289: Blank in figure 7
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial, no change, explanation: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0295.html
    Commenter accepts: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0306.html

    I18N Issue 290

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0259.html
    i18n-ISSUE-290: Case and normalization heads up
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 291

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0260.html
    i18n-ISSUE-291: Fantasy and playful
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 292

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0261.html
    i18n-ISSUE-292: Synthesized cyrillic italics
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 293

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0262.html
    i18n-ISSUE-293: Aspect value vs aspect ratio
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 294

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0263.html
    i18n-ISSUE-294: Fonts available on platforms
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 295

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0264.html
    i18n-ISSUE-295: U+ in unicode-range descriptor
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: rejected, unicode-range syntax already in widespread use http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0296.html
    Commenter accepts: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0307.html

    I18N Issue 296

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0265.html
    i18n-ISSUE-296: Usable characters in unicode-range
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/b08fc2c6efdd
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 296a

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0318.html
    i18n-ISSUE-296a: inclusion of surrogate codepoints within unicode-range values
    Raised By: Anne van Kesteren, as a subtopic of I18N issue 296
    Resolution: no change, surrogate handling behavior unrelated to the use of 'unicode-range' values
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0323.html
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0344.html
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0352.html
    Commenter okay with spec wording: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0423.html

    I18N Issue 297

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0266.html
    i18n-ISSUE-297: Double slash before URI
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 298

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0267.html
    i18n-ISSUE-298: To ensure or to insure, that is the  question
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 299

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0268.html
    i18n-ISSUE-299: Cluster matching 1b
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/b08fc2c6efdd
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0309.html

    I18N Issue 300

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0269.html
    i18n-ISSUE-300: ja-jp too verbose
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html

    I18N Issue 301

    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0271.html
    i18n-ISSUE-301: Unicode reference
    Raised By: Internationalization WG (rishida), three weeks after the end of LC
    Resolution: editorial change, spec updated.
    Fixed in: https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/3479cdefc59a
    Commenter agrees: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Sep/0310.html