# Media Queries Level 4 Disposition of Comments for 2017-09-05 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-mediaqueries-4-20170905/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/mediaqueries-4/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Deprecate 'speech' media type, as it does not match screen readers
    From:     Patrick Lauke
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1751
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1751#issuecomment-634770887

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Increase visibility and strengh of message in a note
    From:     Patrick Lauke
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2470
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/2470#issuecomment-375847730
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Clarify case sensitivity
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2727
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2727#issuecomment-394475794
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Is <mf-range> syntax correct?
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2790
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2790#issuecomment-397816681
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Is the `<mf-range>` "swapping value and name" syntax really useful?
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2791
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2791#issuecomment-402375676
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2791#issuecomment-402375676

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Clarify ASCII case-insensitive
    From:     Frédéric Wang
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4811
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Support <number> (and therefore calc) as a <ratio>
    From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3757
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3757#issuecomment-499625710

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Definition of <ratio> should probably be in css-values
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4908
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor's Discretion

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Consistency of color-gamut keywords
    From:     Christoph Päper
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4535
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4535#issuecomment-574759630

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  The <general-enclosed> production contains unbalanced parentheses
    From:     Andreas Lind
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4534
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editor's Discretion
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4534#issuecomment-557941898

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Use unicode characters for inequality operators
    From:     Yves Lafon
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4333
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor's Discretion
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4333#issuecomment-532933242

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  color-gamut contradiction of UA vs output support
    From:     Greg Whitworth
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4281
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Obvious Bugfix

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Add a new media query feature: client-width and client-height, which equal to (viewport size - scrollbar size)
    From:     張俊芝
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2933
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2933#issuecomment-405942264
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Port Media Groups section of CSS2.1
    From:     Elika Etemad
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2413
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2413#issuecomment-402374797

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  add note to `scan` and `grid` about lack of real-world use?
    From:     Patrick Lauke
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1778
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resovled: Editorial

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  media query width and window.innerWidth may not be equal
    From:     mjf-g
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4713
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4713#issuecomment-638522312

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Define which media features an undisplayed page has
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3800
    Closed:   Deferred

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  remove at-risk marker for interaction media features
    From:     Masataka Yakura
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1989
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1989#issuecomment-648933064

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  Define Media Groups: continuous vs paged, etc.
    From:     Elika Etemad
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5019
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5019#issuecomment-638521048

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Miscelaneous comments from accessibility Review
    From:     Ian Pouncey & Patrick Lauke
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1925
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor's Discretion
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1925#issuecomment-635290022

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Fix typo
    From:     Kivi Shapiro
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4815
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor's Discretion

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  drop optinal-paged
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5287
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Typoes
    From:     Chris Rebert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5288
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial