# CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2017-02-21 WD

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/WD-css-contain-1-20170221/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  layout containment should make an element containing block for absolute/fixed positioned elements
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issue-170956476
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/404#issuecomment-295148939

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Unclear what contain:size does for replaced elements
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issue-169478944
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/382#issuecomment-295148501<Paste>

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  We may want size containment in 1d
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issue-207386839
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1031#issuecomment-295152488

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Make It easier to use contain: size in cases where the size is unknown
    From:     bmaurer
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issue-208209686
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-281277097
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-295157661
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1043#issuecomment-300306823

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Use proper HTML in markup example
    From:     Thierry Koblentz
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issue-209813058
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282089800
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1058#issuecomment-282330942
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Clarify ambiguous phrasing
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/830#issue-197360152
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Reuse "ink overflow" terminology
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/396#issue-170423394
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Layout containment and overflow
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0314.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3vDKAKWCeUgPGC_T2BCSBCq1byCOJfzVfX8i+BbYqOC1Q@mail.gmail.com

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Splitting the "sizing" part from "layout" containment
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBe5Qq7Xb3Cxi6ee4y4b6FxbwYM_mxinvhjpkdWKFAiqw@mail.gmail.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCa-LHxVFGACoGav19wWztQg_GRDmS8fEf=EJaF_B0now@mail.gmail.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/AEA060EC-7235-4C90-97BE-CBC317229714@rivoal.net
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0384.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Remove dependency of paint containment on overflow clip
    From:     leviw
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sME1oBdWnJ-kQikH0jGLC6xYamWr3qvsa6FurQLLeb_A@mail.gmail.com

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Overflow when layout containment is on should be ink overflow
    From:     Florian Rvoal
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/86302BF1-1488-4E69-8529-3332B5A0BB9A@rivoal.net
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3t4RuTWnQr_dDtd18zQEBYRzfi0P35R_HACZGyPmbwVTA@mail.gmail.com
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/02e25a3f48bd0cd1be349513a024d71891d64de0
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  The 'contain' property doesn't work well with regions
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/EF27E698-1B0A-47DB-ACF1-DACE59126A03@rivoal.net
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/D1B9B001.29FD3%25stearns@adobe.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/2A0F0B36-6765-475D-85D9-0AE7DDE6EB94@rivoal.net
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDA+4yz2952hHaf576B6rZdanJsYOQVn5Cg6zgZtd9REdw@mail.gmail.com
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Clarify interaction with display content
    From:     Kyle Zentner
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+h3cCpKxWD=nXedcoFUffg=7+Lk0U=PjH4uVpxdNOePYiwjRg@mail.gmail.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/31FDCD6A-7CAE-4984-9FE4-C3D580CAB49B@rivoal.net
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-19/#e798577

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Clarify interaction with table parts
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55BA836C.6060404@mozilla.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/B10ABC55-830F-46E7-88E5-5659F4E5E926@rivoal.net
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDCxm8F+rQaUzQa47F-H=6W_peyTsZctOYV9a4ZHRUj4hA@mail.gmail.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/CAAWBYDBQ7XCcO69pMn7V6F8DasjMfMWEuof2UTTXOJo9Uf0aZA@mail.gmail.com
    Response: http://www.w3.org/mid/A904B03A-4B63-480F-842E-F4290CD1AACE@rivoal.net
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://logs.csswg.org/irc.w3.org/css/2017-04-21/#e800809

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Typo
    From:     Chris Rebert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1255
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Be more specific about security risks
    From:     Ralf Swick
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1376
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial