# CSS Shapes Module Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2014-02-11 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-shapes-1-20140211/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-shapes-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Tweak last serialization example
    From:     Dirk Schulze
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0047.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0047.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Questioning whether shapes should be in CSS
    From:     Håkon Wium Lie
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0101.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0103.html
    Closed:   Rejected

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Change example divs
    From:     Håkon Wium Lie
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0101.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0103.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Include shapes-from-image-luminance
    From:     Håkon Wium Lie
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0101.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0103.html
    Closed:   Deferred