# CSS Flexible Box Module Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2018-11-19 CR

Dated Draft:
  https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-flexbox-1-20181119/
Editor's Draft:
  http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

Disposition Status Legend and Filters

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Clarifications to size computation dependencies
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2890
    Open:     Pending deeper investigation, scope of edits unknown
    Previous: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/issues-cr-2017#issue-14

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Investigate applying align-content to single-line flex containers
    From:     Tab Atkins and fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3052
    Open:     Pending Web-compat investigation
    Previous: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/issues-cr-2017#issue-16

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Baseline alignment of inline flex containers
    From:     Manuel Rego Casasnovas
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3416
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3416
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Clarify referent in definite sizes section
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3531
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/dbd98f29f7d4cea59078a03b262c8b75f63ee66a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Collapse bullets 1 & 3 in definite sizes section
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3531
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3531#issuecomment-657785333
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Initial values inconsistent with css-align
    From:     Eric Willigers
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3636
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3636#issuecomment-463050318
    Closed:   Deferred
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3636#issuecomment-466987045

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Include padding in scrollable overflow area
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3665
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3665#issuecomment-484360912
    Closed:   Accepted / OutOfScope
    Verified: Reporter is editor

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Missing change in changes section
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3668
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3668#issuecomment-624938271
    Resolved: Editorial
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Max-size clamping of specified size is superfluous
    From:     David Grogan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3669
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3669#issuecomment-484308507
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3669#issuecomment-484577682

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Cross-axis max-size not taken into account
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736#issuecomment-502849251
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3736#issuecomment-502854165

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Example characters are Chinese not Japanese
    From:     ringbell
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957#issuecomment-495062702
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957#issuecomment-495265608
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3957#issuecomment-495303500
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Blockification should be based on computed value, not box display
    From:     Emilio Cobos Àlvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4065
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4065#issuecomment-548924024
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0db00e1870bcb74bd820f89beed168514d9a6ec5
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2019Nov/0009.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4065#issuecomment-553319697

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  ICB clamping of orthogonal flows should apply to flex container itself
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4221
    Closed:   Accepted / OutOfScope (css-writing-modes-4)
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/de44f988b329fe6c4b98b3ddc40a90322abdb2d4
    Resolved: 29 July 2021 vF2F

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  aspect ratio rules should also apply to other content-based sizes
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4226
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Definiteness of inflexible item with min-height: auto
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4305
    Closed:   Duplicate
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4305#issuecomment-898011507

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  min-height:auto should use "definite" rather than "percentage resolution"
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4310
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4310#issuecomment-881066054
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f6ff4e1b001a1a391bf8131d25f0c65a9d60fa9e
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4310#issuecomment-897985279

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  Should definite flex-basis always make main size definite?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4311
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4311#issuecomment-896372435
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: 29 July 2021 vF2F

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  Do unresolvable percentages prevent stretching?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4312
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4312#issuecomment-531981125
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4525#issuecomment-572762219
    Closed:   Accepted / no spec changes
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2020Feb/0008.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4312#issuecomment-577645403

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  Implementations don't include item margins in scrolling area
    From:     Takao Baba
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4577#issue-534711823
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4577#issuecomment-624946612
    Closed:   Question

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Indefiniteness when sizing grid tracks in a flexible flex item
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4852
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4852#issuecomment-881005699
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4852#issuecomment-881087521
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Clamp all of specified/transferred/content sizes by max-size at once
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4901
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4901#issuecomment-721998482
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  target main size is undefined at beginning of flexible length resolution
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-642918532
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/91bab66ac6081f971c07f0d0007287439b04e6f7
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-643255222
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-858168593
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/88cb91df1257cf2dc03506169c1fa55ab52cecf7
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-882476818

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Sizing replaced flex items: "perform layout" underdefined
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5188
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5188#issuecomment-642924434
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ab0e4fe2142c730374cd106fbabac848c9e3c8f9
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5188#issuecomment-643258449

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  Conflicting definitions of used cross size
    From:     Simon Sapin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190#issuecomment-642929504
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/dbc8f6df5c759a53808c6562c550f6e1d695ef50
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190#issuecomment-643269004
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190#issuecomment-858162321
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5190#issuecomment-882479837

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  Clarify aspect ratio calculations box
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5246
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5246#issuecomment-668848636
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5246#issuecomment-682211322

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  Undefined transferred size suggestion
    From:     David Grogan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5347
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5347#issuecomment-722005487
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5347#issuecomment-722015784

    Issue 27. #
    Summary:  Percentages don't account for gaps
    From:     Jacob Bearce
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5399
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5399#issuecomment-669258207
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 28. #
    Summary:  Avoid percentage height quirk in new layout models
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5545
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5545#issuecomment-866353633
    Open:     https://github.com/whatwg/quirks/pull/76
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5545#issuecomment-1939708351

    Issue 29. #
    Summary:  Initial value of flex-grow incorrect?
    From:     Louis Lazaris
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5602
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5602#issuecomment-706440060
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5602#issuecomment-706580966

    Issue 30. #
    Summary:  Define -webkit- aliases in css-flexbox-1
    From:     Sam Sneddon
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5634
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5634#issuecomment-722049318
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cd97478183c75a8cde070d91fad4c3f1e55b6765
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2020Nov/0007.html ∈

    Issue 31. #
    Summary:  Does definite cross-size from container transfer across ratio?
    From:     Ting-yu Lin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5663
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5663#issuecomment-721453016
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 32. #
    Summary:  Omitted flex-basis from flex shorthand: 0 or 0%?
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5742
    Open:     Deferred
    Note:     Waiting for implementations to catch up on intrinsic sizing

    Issue 33. #
    Summary:  Alignment vs static position of abspos flex container children
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5843
    Open:     Deferred
    Note:     Needs compat data

    Issue 34. #
    Summary:  order applies-to doesn't mention grid items
    From:     Julian Descottes
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-884323316
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-884524335
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5865#issuecomment-885235341
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0259f1f7df9fc4649501c3a4735261418e667a3a
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/cf784533604d82add454a04078f6810637209e97
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Jul/0011.html ∈

    Issue 35. #
    Summary:  collapsed flex items influence on containers intrinsic main size
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5985
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5985#issuecomment-858135479
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/60ffc4058780d832d880a076fe02788f0cc6e8a7
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Jun/0010.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5985#issuecomment-862543001

    Issue 36. #
    Summary:  preferred aspect ratio doesn't include aspect-ratio property
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6058
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6058#issuecomment-788160821
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6058#issuecomment-788163962

    Issue 37. #
    Summary:  Clarify handling of aspect ratio without definite cross size
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6109
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2cbe6b3964d07df1190fefb201b720b86675a513
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: commenter is editor

    Issue 38. #
    Summary:  content overflows flex container instead of flex item
    From:     Joe Pea
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6260
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6260#issuecomment-858829549
    Closed:   Rejected
    Note:     Cannot change behavior at this point anyway
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 39. #
    Summary:  Example 4 unreadable in dark mode
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6387
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/38cab179f81ccd3aeda7f5d25589ef233b607a7a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 40. #
    Summary:  resolving flex item auto preferred size for max-content contribution
    From:     Andy Jakubowski
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6455
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6455#issuecomment-896378575
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/fe5ad42fe7568e3864f793b6b6b257ad5c3b9f81
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6455#issuecomment-896378575 (thumbs up)

    Issue 41. #
    Summary:  Definiteness of min-height: min-content/max-content undefined
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6457
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/d0f304031403ac1e286bb5f0beafdeca3d0e6e14
    Open:     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6457#issuecomment-1992500598
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2021Oct/0004.html ∈

    Issue 42. #
    Summary:  When can available space for flex items be infinite?
    From:     Andy Jakubowski
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6476
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6476#issuecomment-897880817
    Closed:   Answered

    Issue 43. #
    Summary:  Resolving percentage padding on flex items
    From:     Andy Jakubowski
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6510
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6510#issuecomment-897885776
    Closed:   Answered

    Issue 44. #
    Summary:  Add flex layout aliases for alignment properties
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6514
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6514#issuecomment-917222064
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 45. #
    Summary:  flex shorthand defaults conflict with flex-grow/shrink initial values
    From:     pnabbefeld
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6639
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6639#issuecomment-922242306
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6639#issuecomment-922256842
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6639#issuecomment-1220029390
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ef78972c3944f98919f41a4a9b6c841989f28168
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 46. #
    Summary:  Serialization of <number> in flex-grow/flex-shrink not interoperable
    From:     Sergio Villar
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6706
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6706#issuecomment-932644943
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Note:     CSSOM issue https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6471

    Issue 47. #
    Summary:  Bad results from intrinsic cross size algo for column wrap flex containers
    From:     David Grogan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6777
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6777#issuecomment-1071211730
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6777#issuecomment-1220003107
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5630e7b064addc6f2f9f57e68935e3cb3e778b65
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2022Oct/0015.html ∈

    Issue 48. #
    Summary:  Parenthetical wrt preferred sizes is imprecise
    From:     David Grogan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6778
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6778#issuecomment-954875571
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f17ec7afe72fd14a2445354ec5e1feb34c09b597
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 49. #
    Summary:  Automatic min size should use min-intrinsic instead of min-content
    From:     David Grogan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1063323692
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1063323692
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1218597495
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1219962451
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1220038900
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1226273138
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1248742930
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-2010318313
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-2125293490
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/11690
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2024May/0017.html ∈

    Issue 50. #
    Summary:  Flexbox alignment and margins across fragmentation breaks
    From:     Alison Maher
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6812
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6812#issuecomment-973631150
    Open:     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6812#issuecomment-2584970370
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2022Jan/0004.html ∈

    Issue 51. #
    Summary:  Percentage height resolution inside flex items with indefinite basis
    From:     Sergio Villar
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6822
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6822#issuecomment-1021925726
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/82b921239055547e72e4de0d47ab8fa0ada3e60a
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2022Jan/0016.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6822#issuecomment-1218371795

    Issue 52. #
    Summary:  Multi-line column flex fragmentation
    From:     Alison Maher
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6855
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6855#issuecomment-1102928864
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6855#issuecomment-1102959875
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/da573d2689150c1163c24faed834c7d91fe52cda
    Open
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2022Mar/0001.html ∈
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2022May/0002.html ∈

    Issue 53. #