# CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2019-11-21 REC

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/REC-css-contain-1-20191121/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

None

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  contain:size needs to mention its effect on aspect-ratio
    From:     Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5585
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5585#issuecomment-713158240

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Improve terminology
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5590
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5590#issuecomment-713164655

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Clarify on specifying aspect-ratio and contain:size on replaced elements
    From:     Ting-Yu Lin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5550#issuecomment-713166309

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Shortcut values should compute to the longhand ones
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5511
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5511#issuecomment-713161854

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Mistaken syntax in example
    From:     TimVevida
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5506
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5506#issuecomment-713163539

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Use standard terminology rather than ad-hoc phrasing with the same meaning
    From:     Mats Plamgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4946
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4946#issuecomment-617892686

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Clarify interaction between size containment and grid track sizing`
    From:     Mats Plamgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4931
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/5643
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/5643#issuecomment-722045252

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Clarify effects of size containment on intrinsic sizes
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4741
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4741#issuecomment-585316698