# CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-05-14 LCWD

Dated Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-flexbox-1-20150514/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  min/max-content sizes of flex containers incorrectly defined
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0429.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0189.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Should min/max-content sizes of flex containers include flex-basis?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0007.html
    Closed:   Retracted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Can percentages resolve given min-size: auto?
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0031.html
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0205.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0014.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
    Verified: reporter participated in task force that proposed resolution

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Quirks mode percentage size resolution, 'flex: 1', and intrinsic heights
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0027.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0232.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Static position of abspos incompatible with css-align definition
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0357.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0018.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0142.html
    Verified: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20151202#l-49

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Do flex item determination before anonymous box fixup.
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0246.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Clarify % margin/padding behavior
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0052.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0190.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Add a11y requirements to authoring tools
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0180.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0348.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Editorial Comments
    From:     timeless
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0075.html
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Broken Styling
    From:     Ryan Prichard
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0020.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0027.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Note:     Bug appears to have disappeared?
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Blink objects to percentage-margin change
    From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
    Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
    Closed:   Accepted
    Notes:    Amended spec to allow both behaviors, as the CSSWG had no consensus.
    Verified: reporter is editor
    Minutes:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
              https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Intrinsic Cross size of flex container totally wrong
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0253.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0055.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Revert omitted flex-basis 0 -> 0% change
    From      fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0429.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Use first available baseline instead of first item's baseline
    From:     timeless
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0345.html
    Response:
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0064.html

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Add a tab-order property
    From:     Bo Campbell
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0285.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html
    Closed:   Rejected

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Are abspos whose containing block is flexbox affected by % resolution change?
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0154.html
    Open:     Depends on issue #11
    Note:     WG appears to lean towards consistency within grid/flex over consistency within abspos

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  Minimum spacing between flex items vs. around flex items
    From:     Den
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0108.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0109.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0151.html
    Closed:   Deferred

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  Blockify internal table elements instead of wrapping them in anonymous boxes
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0246.html
    Response:
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0038.html
    Verified: reporter is spec editor

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Applies-to error for justify-items
    From:     Javier Fernandez
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0413.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0425.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  Interaction of min-height: auto and scrollbars
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0022.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0023.html
    Closed:   Question
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0024.html

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  Editorial comments
    From:     timeless
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0075.html
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0085.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Typo?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0224.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0225.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  Breaking lines at max-height/width not defined
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0099.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0021.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  <textarea> as flex container
    From:     John Waterson
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0115.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Oct/0116.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0024.html
    Closed:   OutOfScope

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  Percentages resolving against definite max-height
    From:     Tab and fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Nov/0067.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0029.html

    Issue 27. #
    Summary:  Fragmentation rule forces break-inside: avoid
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0163.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Dec/0233.html
    Verified: Reporter is spec editor