# CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2020-12-22 REC

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/REC-css-contain-1-20201222

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

None

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  contain:size shouldn't fragment as monolithic
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5648
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5648#issuecomment-715036609
    Closed:   Deferred
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5648#issuecomment-1240034875

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Minor editorial tweaks and grammar corrections
    From:     Chris Lilley
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5806
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Should css-contain-1 allow new features post publication as REC?
    From:     Chris Lilley
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5806
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5808#issuecomment-748575361
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editors' discretion
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5808#event-4134236457

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  :root/body viewport propagation and containment
    From:     Rune Lillesveen
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5913
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5913#issuecomment-844290779 (tracked in spec as Candidate Correction 3)
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5808#event-4134236457

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  should it be possible for an element with contain:paint to be part of a transform-style:preserve-3d scene?
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6202
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6202#issuecomment-857863089 (resulted in change to other spec)

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  paint containment vs filter effects
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6325
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6325#issuecomment-866993550 (editorial)

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Are intrinsic sizing keywords definite with size containment?
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7206
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7206#issuecomment-1218266195 (editorial change to another spec)