Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-css-flexbox-1-20140925/
Title:    CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1

Overflow issues for next DoC:
  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0411.html
    Compat risk warning
  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0255.html
    True shrinkwrapping. More of a Sizing issue.
  - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0299.html
    Bunch of stuff to reject/defer

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Use preferred size instead of max-content size
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0385.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0424.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Flex item handling of anonymous boxes should be normative
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0265.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0268.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0269.html
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Editorial nits
From:     Alan Stearns
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0267.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0431.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Alignment shouldn't depend on number of lines, but on wrappability
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0489.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0341.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0004.html
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Clarify sizing of abspos flex containers
From:     François Remy
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0396.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0191.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Error in stretch definition
From:     Greg Whitworth
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0429.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0430.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  Alias no-wrap to nowrap
From:     Tab Atkins
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0188.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0581.html
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Error in flex container max-content definition
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0443.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0340.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Scaled flex shrink factor should multiply by outer, not inner, base size
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0417.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0495.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editors' discretion
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  Revert 'flex-basis: auto' rename, add 'content' value instead
From:     Rossen Atanassov
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0023.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0342.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0401.html
Followup: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0346.html
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  Clarify that flex layout is writing-mode relative
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0058.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0344.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Example should state general case, put specific in parens, not vice versa
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0060.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0343.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Why are there sheep?
From:     Addison Phillips
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0059.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0064.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  'flex' section needs editorial love
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0066.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: reporter is spec editor
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  Stray references to old spec prose
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0078.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0089.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  'order' should affect speech/navigation order
From:     Bo Campbell
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0119.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0121.html
Closed:   Rejected
Note:     WG still open to further discussion on solving the relevant concerns,
          will follow up
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  Forced flex line breaking controls
From:     Glen Huang
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0322.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0336.html
Closed:   Deferred
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  Spec conflicts with itself on interpretation of break controls
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0349.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0263.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Blink refuses to implement percentage-margin change
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
Open
Note:     Issue noted, pending later discussion
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  Definite flexed size requires definite flex container main size
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0022.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Clarify that flex base size doesn't include min/max clamping
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0377.html
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0428.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  Clarify whether layout is required for min/max-content sizing.
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0049.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0044.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  Should justify-self:stretch compute to flex-start, or just act like it?
From:     Javier Fernandez
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0247.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Filed against CSS Align
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  Static position of an abspos child of a flex container is confusingly defined
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0137.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0047.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  min-width:auto shouldn't take definite flex-basis into account
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0038.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0063.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Some "flex basis" links are wrong
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0534.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0264.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
