# CSS Display Module Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-10-15 WD

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-display-3-20151015/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-display-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  table-caption & table-cell should use flow-root not flow
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0372.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0064.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Define <br> and <wbr>
    From:     Ian Hickson, Tab Atkins
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0155.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/610#issuecomment-274911199
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0065.html ∈
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0066.html ∈
    Closed:   Deferred to HTML https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2291
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Shouldn't root be in-flow?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0332.html ∈
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Interaction of run-in and ::first-letter
    From:     Florian Rivoal
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0330.html ∈
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/650#issuecomment-274908554
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Inconsistent implementation of 'display: flex' on <fieldset>
    From:     glanbin
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-232788709
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Consider removing 'display: run-in'
    From:     Ms2ger
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/339#issuecomment-234783783
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor discretion
    -

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Define interaction of 'display: contents' and replaced elements
    From:     Simon Pieters
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/540#issuecomment-285214950
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sQbKYcM6mmRueGJBozPGer_UwQDMyv+eww3kOBAHC7mg@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    -

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Display value visible to AT
    From:     Dave Cramer, Sara Soueidan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/560#issuecomment-270094051
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Effect of 'display: contents' on counter scoping
    From:     Xidorn Quan
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/674
    Response:
    Closed:   Accepted
    Note:     Still needs edits in css-lists-3.
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Feb/0062.html ∈

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Why is introduction normative? Also defining “element”?
    From:     Anne van Kesteren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/680#issuecomment-270103941
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  'display: contents' on root element
    From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/805#issuecomment-266991346
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  “run-in box with 'display: flow'” nonsensical
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/832#issuecomment-270106512
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  "flow-root" harmful
    From:     Binyammin Laukstein
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275141140
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/983#issuecomment-275208753

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Rename flow-root
    From:     Simon Fraser
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/964#issuecomment-274638719
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ⎆
    Verified: https://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3sTiUi9iibZpc+G0F4=Pn6y9VMbeBaQQ4SKNKPGyOMowA@mail.gmail.com ⎆

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Tooltips are wrong
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/834#issuecomment-280431244
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 17. #
    Summary:  HTML shouldn't be a normative reference
    From:     Bert Bos
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1011#issuecomment-286501361
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 18. #
    Summary:  What are form controls?
    From:     Boris Zbarsky
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1024#issuecomment-285215276
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 19. #
    Summary:  Anonymous boxes inheriting from `display: contents`
    From:     Oriol, Boris Zbarsky
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1249
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301942276
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1118#issuecomment-301953751

    Issue 20. #
    Summary:  Propagation of text-decoration applied to `display: contents`
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1136#issuecomment-301938274
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/a9a8bdda32c4d22a2cbc98d6c3724b72f651b6b3
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈

    Issue 21. #
    Summary:  `display: block` seems to define flex and grid items as block-level
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292656095
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1175#issuecomment-292738919
    Response:
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 22. #
    Summary:  Display erroneously groups ruby with atomic inlines
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1180#issuecomment-292638199
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 23. #
    Summary:  Block containers can also establish an inline formatting context
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301622704
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-301630234
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1185#issuecomment-314583112
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 24. #
    Summary:  Revisions to *-level definitions
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294637052
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-294646968
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1186#issuecomment-301623329
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 25. #
    Summary:  Do table captions participate in BFC or TFC?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1189#issuecomment-301626461
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 26. #
    Summary:  Table contains invalid values
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1225#issuecomment-301631015
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 27. #
    Summary:  list-item definition implies invalid keyword combos are valid
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1226#issuecomment-301631288
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 28. #
    Summary:  Do contents and none have outer display type?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1227#issuecomment-301631748
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 29. #
    Summary:  Run-in erroneously excludes blocks that establish inline formatting context
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1228#issuecomment-301632605
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2f6354014360662e2aef0e25da433852d4fa8b3a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 30. #
    Summary:  Blockification rules not backwards-compatible for inline-block
    From:     Boris Zbarsky
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-301634850
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-305246779
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1246#issuecomment-313211986
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Aug/0042.html ∈

    Issue 31. #
    Summary:  Rename “block container” to “flow container”
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301635795
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor discretion
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1265#issuecomment-301639507

    Issue 32. #
    Summary:  Text nodes vs text runs
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1281#issuecomment-301942809
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈

    Issue 33. #
    Summary:  Inheritance with 'display: contents' and ::first-line
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1310#issuecomment-301641199
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Notes:    Deferred to css-pseudo-4, as ::first-line in general needs tighter definition
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈

    Issue 34. #
    Summary:  Define 'display: contents' as a type of box
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299120942
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1313#issuecomment-299247618
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 35. #
    Summary:  Define more sensible blockification for layout-internal types
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1340#issuecomment-301641681
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5aaca4a7030e818cd02ac2d93137e1cd1d295bae
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 36. #
    Summary:  Inlinification, recursion, and ruby vs display definitions
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301643296
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-301944521
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1341#issuecomment-313204672
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jun/0009.html ∈

    Issue 37. #
    Summary:  Does display: contents apply to ::before ::after
    From:     Emilio
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1345#issuecomment-313205067
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017May/0057.html ∈

    Issue 38. #
    Summary:  Define interaction of various box tree fixups
    From:     Boris Zbarsky
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301878155
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-301888405
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302250667
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1355#issuecomment-302748058
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f5b79e99bb8fc9ebea4ed956ed3420bc69b90786
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 39. #
    Summary:  Root inline box vs anonymous inline boxes
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301832460
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301833956
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1383#issuecomment-301872204
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/6aeeabe060c8d8c1397ef2196a4e3a62da964d5e
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 40. #
    Summary:  Inlinification by display type or anon box fixup?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1390#issuecomment-313211238
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 41. #
    Summary:  Computation of 'float' vs 'position' without a box
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1436#issuecomment-313215820
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Notes:    Accepted, pending edits to css-2 and css-position-3
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html ∈

    Issue 42. #
    Summary:  Are run-in contents inside ::first-line?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313246128
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1441#issuecomment-313249402

    Issue 43. #
    Summary:  “Becoming a formatting context” section is a mess
    From:     Oriol, fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1457#issuecomment-313225448
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1563#issuecomment-314573128
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/94982e838a558e6c66516b3b13e403eae32e27ad
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0030.html ∈

    Issue 44. #
    Summary:  Is 'position: marker' out-of-flow?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1458#issuecomment-313224602
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 45. #
    Summary:  Does run-in algo recurse?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1460#issuecomment-314593762
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c9f1bb16d0e5077b9bca7027a7d7252eeff5abf1
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 46. #
    Summary:  Parallel construction should be pairwise disjoint (editorial)
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1470
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/09212af80e10e4e3e57965bb27b2de3fdcd86e06
    Closed:   Fixed
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 47. #
    Summary:  BFC definition not quite right
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313240736
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313247457
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313263022
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313252408
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1471#issuecomment-313266528
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ffc79e46b2f691d334b00d69ed23dde50a4068b3
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 48. #
    Summary:  Run-in fixup vs block-in-inline fixup
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1472#issuecomment-313242917
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 49. #
    Summary:  Note wrt inheritance of ::first-line through 'display: contents'.
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1473#issuecomment-313247421
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 50. #
    Summary:  Display types: on elements or on boxes?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314569164
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1480#issuecomment-314583675

    Issue 51. #
    Summary:  Should 'inline-foo' and 'inline foo' be distinct?
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1486#issuecomment-320022628
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 52. #
    Summary:  At-risk list omits three-component values
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1490
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/394c62f72fda4ac824c9ce204a99bf991b9e6471
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 53. #
    Summary:  Discrepancies in run-in
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1491#issuecomment-314570280
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 54. #
    Summary:  Serialization of list-item values not listed
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1493#issuecomment-314572350
    Closed:   OutOfScope (to CSSOM) / Rejected (for editorial)
    Resolved: Bugfix / Editorial

    Issue 55. #
    Summary:  Missing definition of 'inline-list-item'
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1495#issuecomment-306282449
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2017Jul/0015.html ∈

    Issue 56. #
    Summary:  Redesign 'flow-root' keyword and related features
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-319986260
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1496#issuecomment-320027059

    Issue 57. #
    Summary:  Inlinification doesn't inlinify layout-internal boxes
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1582#issuecomment-314605575
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 58. #
    Summary:  <legend> with no box example is confusing
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494427
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313494885
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-313498359
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1584#issuecomment-391181313
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/beb5964179f6fc815e59e23a1de501cddab7355a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Notes:    See also https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3702
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 59. #
    Summary:  Blocks that contain only inlines, establishing BFC+IFC?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1553#issuecomment-375120025
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/8bb4d824180eccee53864aa40b883d0eb7140c0a
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 60. #
    Summary:  Define establishing a BFC as a flow-root only thing via used values
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1550#issuecomment-387160020
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/0258e7ac526cffce6e81d13110ba79a681504fff
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/72141508e866058bd9a431abdb97c3406d9e34b2
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈

    Issue 61. #
    Summary:  Is the principal box unique?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1604#issuecomment-374366647
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Notes:    Follow-up for css-flow-3 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1477

    Issue 62. #
    Summary:  run-in fixup should create inline-block when parent inlinifies
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1607#issuecomment-374368323
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 63. #
    Summary:  Define how block containers establish an inline formatting context
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374369526
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374376423
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-374385637
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1617#issuecomment-398958073
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 64. #
    Summary:  Position of 'list-item' when serializing 'display'
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1621#issuecomment-374730492
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 65. #
    Summary:  Clarify that outer display type only affects principal box
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1622
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c5d8900d4cc8dedd4f7a02d506d0e0cd2cb5a639
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 66. #
    Summary:  Compact at-risk list
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1623
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/9f72f245cba50a173813c36b771f552fe8104964
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 67. #
    Summary:  list-item generates ::marker pseudo-element (not necessarily box)
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1625
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ed5c6a31724e014f3336dbf7901c5ef5cb1eaf20
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 68. #
    Summary:  Mismatched references (to CSS2 vs css-lists-3)
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1626#issuecomment-374373751
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/7af6650e9ad441bac22fe833cb413112262f9149
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 69. #
    Summary:  Mention that block ruby generates principal block box
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1629
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/5e90348a26aecbed6d878cce89cbbc7db1b058ff
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 70. #
    Summary:  run-in insertion point vs ::marker with 'display'
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1638#issuecomment-316979494
    Closed:   Retracted

    Issue 71. #
    Summary:  Are run-in sequences merged during reparenting?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1639
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ef3c8fd8b2fe85c32a2dc393ca3b2810a414ea88
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 72. #
    Summary:  Clarify run-in recursion vs anonymous-block wrapping
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374384660
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c7841af7ab963a5e91b2436ffe60ece80700cc7e
    Closed:   Accepted
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-374390920
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1640#issuecomment-398963365
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 73. #
    Summary:  Define inner display type of replaced elements
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-374399290
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 74. #
    Summary:  How does inner display type compute on replaced elements if out of scope?
    From:     Sebastien Zartner
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-317237475
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1642#issuecomment-398964350
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 75. #
    Summary:  Define style computation reflection between boxes and elements
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1702#issuecomment-374415941
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/b2d484c6ab9c4dbdb8fdca899e2d37d59d6953e3
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈

    Issue 76. #
    Summary:  Define some box construction guidance for specs
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-350398313
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/533ac0a31b0262c4a0d09c77e19604666fe35e14
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈

    Issue 77. #
    Summary:  table grid box is not a defined term
    From:     David Baron
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-376733708
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-378768000
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/193022f623acd1b95a1fddae76fd98408a618d8b
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 78. #
    Summary:  Rename table box to table grid box (in CSS2 & CSS Tables L3)
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2501#issuecomment-380792875
    Open:     Changing back is pending edits to CSS2 and css-tables-3
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0044.html ∈

    Issue 79. #
    Summary:  Boxes shouldn't have display types, should only have levels/FC-types
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-374423595
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1643#issuecomment-407597682
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 80. #
    Summary:  Explicitly exclude non-zero sequences of run-ins from processing
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398970537
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1663#issuecomment-398982401
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 81. #
    Summary:  Link to definition of white space
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1664
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ada381e196c8ed510977cb55916ee5fb96447b25
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 82. #
    Summary:  s/text/text run/ now that text run is defined
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1667
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/c3a695c65170e1667090d87310b87df79d93d398
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 83. #
    Summary:  What if containing block is not ICB and not generated from a box?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-319916887
    Closed:   Invalid
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-350404179
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1672#issuecomment-374790036
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 84. #
    Summary:  Make inlinified 'block ruby' an inline-block instead of inline
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700#issuecomment-374415499
    Closed:   Rejected
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 85. #
    Summary:  'block' only generates block-level boxes in flow layout
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1704#issuecomment-374418771
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4358d72a927b265d9b7482a57277dc635c076b76
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 86. #
    Summary:  Clarify blockification of 'run-in flow-root'
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1715#issuecomment-374420463
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈

    Issue 87. #
    Summary:  'display' computed value wrong in propdef table
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1716
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 89. #
    Summary:  Do empty text nodes generate text runs?
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1808#issuecomment-329345715
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/4c21a2aa923a757c577bf4a4e33a6291a78c8690
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 90. #
    Summary:  Clarify element tree definition
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1810#issuecomment-375137826
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈

    Issue 91. #
    Summary:  SVG 'display: contents' interaction incompletely defined
    From:     Rune Lillesveen
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2118#issuecomment-374802030
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/2cdf747bbbfe0c58a87455beca9c35b72555b09a
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 92. #
    Summary:  Define interaction of 'display: contents' and MathML
    From:     Emilio Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375119086
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/1d3e6a04c847df82fa3c4023e23f4ea55dcab169
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2167#issuecomment-375792285
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Apr/0005.html ∈

    Issue 93. #
    Summary:  Does 'display' affect screen reader semantics?
    From:     Ilya Streltsyn
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-368287740
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-375084853
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378670370
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378778909
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 94. #
    Summary:  Does 'display: contents' affect anchor targeting?
    From:     Ilya Streltsyn
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378842501
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2355#issuecomment-378992876
    Changes:  https://github.com/fergald/csswg-drafts/commit/2343af6382b55e8ce5caf9c0ee40d68ef032b421
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor discretion

    Issue 95. #
    Summary:  Effect of 'display: contents' on SVG layout attributes
    From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-378809174
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2502#issuecomment-399498551

    Issue 96. #
    Summary:  Integrate definition of Shadow Trees
    From:     Anne van Kesteren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2365
    Closed:   OutOfScope
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018May/0036.html ∈

    Issue 97. #
    Summary:  Blockification should establish a new formatting context
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2598#issuecomment-387157017
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 98. #
    Summary:  Swap where default inner/outer display types are defined
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-391175246
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2658#issuecomment-393271657
    Resolved: Editorial
    ---
    Issue 99.
    Summary:  Blockification of blocks should establish new FC
    From:     Oriol
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2673#issuecomment-389935782
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html ∈
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jul/0017.html ∈

    Issue 100. #
    Summary:  Compute 'display: contents' on elided elements to 'none'
    From:     Emlio Álvarez
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2755
    Changes:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/f13b84237c6a17823ebdd55919d15d3bac83275b
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Jun/0032.html ∈

    Issue 101. #
    Summary:  Revisit equivalency of `inline-block` and `inline flow-root`
    From:     Oriol Brufau
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2947
    Closed:   Rejected
    Notes:    See also earlier issues / discussion.
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html ∈
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2018Aug/0018.html ∈