Draft:    https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/CR-css-contain-1-20180524/
Title:    CSS Contain Level 1

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Size contain shouldn't apply to tables
From:     Morgan Rae Reschenberg
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395242022
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-395256815
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2746#issuecomment-397009331
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  specified column/row sizes on grid containers should contribute to contain:size
From:     Morgan Rae Reschenberg
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399291965
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-399585146
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-400243568
Closed:   Accepted / Editorial
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2804#issuecomment-402574020
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  `contain` may not want to be animatable
From:     Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2737#issuecomment-402574750
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  "scoped to an element" definition unused or unclear
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2845#issuecomment-401319909
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Need clarification on layout containment & fragmentation
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2840#issuecomment-401249631
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  'counter-increment' and 'content' property names should be linkified
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2800
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  contain:layout is a CB for fixpos/abspos descendants but doesn't establish a stacking context
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406716817
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-406735520
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-407956323
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-408244344
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2942#issuecomment-409762755
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  containment vs baseline alignment
From:     Florian Rivoal
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411126837
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-411371226
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2995#issuecomment-415094473
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  Clarify spec text about ink-overflow
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3032
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-413883793
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3023#issuecomment-417016569
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  maybe 'contain-size' shouldn't apply to display:table-caption
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-408369314
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325
Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2952#issuecomment-417018325
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  containment probably shouldn't apply to most SVG elements
From:     David Baron
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410374314
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410385899
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410388088
Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-410809409
Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-420710732
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2987#issuecomment-420710732
