# CSS Text Decoration Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2013-01-03 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-css-text-decor-3-20130103/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-text-decor-3/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Remove text-underline-position to allow creation of arbitrary decorations
    From:     Sebastian Zartner
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0282.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0111.html
    Closed:   Rejected
    Verified:

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Loosen position of emphasis marks when set on text with ruby
    From:     Koji Ishii
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0086.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0092.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0102.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0122.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0112.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Clarify spaces skipped by 'text-decoration-skip'
    From:     Addison Phillips
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0079.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0100.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified:

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Clarify positioning of emphasis marks vs. ruby
    From:     Addison Phillips
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0079.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0101.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified:

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Should visible word separators be skipped by 'text-decoration-skip: spaces'?
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0100.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0113.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  Drop 'text-underline-position: alphabetic'?
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0529.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Apr/0578.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0139.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Define z-order of emphasis marks
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0527.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0142.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Change of underline/overline z-order wrt CSS 2.1
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0526.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0141.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Define z-order of decorations drawn across atomic inlines
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0525.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0140.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Positioning of under/left/right underlines unclear
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0530.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0143.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Line positioning per-line or across lines?
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0532.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0145.html
    Proposal: Mark undefined
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
    Closed:   Deferred

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  Line decorations should have consistent thickness (ignoring descendants)
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0533.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0146.html
    Proposal: Mark undefined
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
    Closed:   Deferred

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Line decorations should have consistent position (ignoring descendants)
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0533.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0146.html
    Proposal: Mark undefined
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
    Closed:   Deferred

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Underline positioning needs more detail
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0530.html
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Mar/0534.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0147.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Should text-shadow be ink color or currentColor?
    From:     dbaron
    Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0150.html
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013May/0177.html
    Closed:   Accepted

    Issue 16. #
    Summary:  Shadow text + decorations: layer or composite?
    From:     dbaron, fantasai
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/20130507060209.GA12331@crum.dbaron.org
    Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/51B586EA.2030502@inkedblade.net
    Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jul/0105.html
    Closed:   Accepted