# CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2016-03-01 CR

Dated Draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/CR-css-flexbox-1-20160301/

Editor's Draft: http://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Clarify that spatial navigation can honor 'order'
    From:     Cynthia Shelly
    Comment:  [a11y telecon]
    Response: [a11y telecon]
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: SF F2F

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  Clarify in 9.8 that auto-height flex containers can also create definiteness
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0121.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0037.html
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/88ade2efb4e8
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0038.html
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Define how child percentages factor into intrinsic size calculations
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0322.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0039.html
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/75be56c11fda
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0044.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0050.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editor's discretion (due to review from the competent people above)

    Issue 4. #
    Summary:  Aren't absolutely-positioned flex containers always definite?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0180.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0040.html
    Note:     Added example of “other formula” to Sizing.
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/89ee7fd37001
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editor's discretion

    Issue 5. #
    Summary:  Does 9.8 make some sizes *indefinite* that were previously definite
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0319.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0041.html
    Closed:   Invalid
    Verified: in person

    Issue 6. #
    Summary:  What about unresolvable percentages?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0008.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0042.html
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/342ac9d5c892
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 7. #
    Summary:  Why is a flex item with definite flex basis not definite in an indefinite container?
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Feb/0316.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0043.html
    Closed:   Invalid

    Issue 8. #
    Summary:  Clarify that inflexible items with definite basis are definite
    From:     fantasai
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0043.html
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/fbcbe170c119
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0047.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0049.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: Reporter is editor
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 9. #
    Summary:  Make Implied Minimum Size section easier to understand
    From:     fantasai
    Changes:  https://hg.csswg.org/drafts/rev/25641c92d33f
    Closed:   Accepted
    Verified: Reporter is editor
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 10. #
    Summary:  Flexbox's definite/indefinite size definitions are out-of-date
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0434.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Mar/0439.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 11. #
    Summary:  Define “inflexible”
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0054.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0057.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 12. #
    Summary:  'order' effects on abspos unimplemented
    From:     fantasai
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0186.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0347.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0351.html

    Issue 13. #
    Summary:  Sync baselines section with Box Alignment
    From:     fantasai
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Bugfix

    Issue 14. #
    Summary:  Clarify alignment property effects on static position, esp wrt stretch
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0538.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Apr/0368.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 15. #
    Summary:  Make intrinsic sizes definite for percentage resolution
    From:     Christian Biesinger
    Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0050.html
    Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016May/0135.html
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: SF F2F