# Disposition of comments

Title
  CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3
Date
  2012-02-14
URL
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-css3-background-20120214/

There are no objections.

# | Author | Summary and discussion | Result
--- | --- | --- | ---
1. | Florian Rivoal | Add 'background-position-x' and 'background-position-y' comment reply | Rejected and verified
2. | David Baron | Computed value line for 'background-repeat' is imprecise comment reply | Accepted
3 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec comment reply | Accepted
4 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | “Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose comment reply | Accepted
5 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal comment reply | Accepted
6 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2 comment reply | Accepted
7 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4 comment reply | Accepted
8 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5 comment reply | Accepted
9 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Remove redundant paragraph “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5 comment reply | Accepted
10 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same comment reply | Accepted
11 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6 comment reply | Accepted
12 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius' comment reply | Accepted
13 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Initial value of 'border-radius' should be “see individual properties” comment reply | Accepted
14 | Christoph Päper | Also allow to specify corners with an <angle> instead of two <length> comment reply | Rejected and verified
15 | Christoph Päper | Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp) comment reply | Rejected and verified
16 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | 'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash. Syntax should disallow it. And maybe also disallow two slashes in a row. comment reply | Accepted
17 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | 'background' shorthand specification text fails to say that 'background-image' is reset. comment reply | Accepted
18 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | The specification should say which background and border properties apply to first-line and first-letter. comment reply comment reply | Accepted
19 | Fantasai (WG member) | What is the background of the page area? comment (Filed as issue for css3-page) | Out of scope and verified
20 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Rewording and more verbose grammar (or an informative note) for 'background-position' comment reply | Accepted
21 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when 'border-image-source' doesn't apply comment reply | Accepted
22 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution) comment reply | Accepted
23 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables comment | Accepted
24 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not” (“may not be negative”). Should say: “are not allowed.” comment reply | Accepted
25 | Lev Solntsev | Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers. comment reply comment reply reply | Rejected but unverified
26 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | What is the “boundary” of a table cell? comment reply | Accepted

Legend:

Status | Meaning
--- | ---
Retracted | Commenter has withdrawn the comment.
Accepted | The WG accepted and applied the comment.
Out of scope and verified | Commenter accepts that the comment is out of scope.
Invalid and verified | Commenter accepts that the comment is invalid.
Rejected and verified | Commenter accepts that the WG did not apply the comment.
Out of scope but unverified | Comment out of scope, but commenter did not yet react.
Invalid but unverified | Comment invalid, but commenter did not yet react.
Rejected but unverified | Comment rejected, but commenter did not yet react.
Out of scope with objection | Comment out of scope, but commenter disagrees.
Invalid with objection | Comment invalid, but commenter disagrees.
Rejected with objection | Comment rejected, but commenter objects.

This file was generated from issues-lc-2012.txt on 5 April 2012.