Draft:    http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-css-writing-modes-3-20140320/
Title:    CSS Writing Modes Level 3

TODO:
1. Switch to "typographic character unit" terminology
2. Get SVGWG to review several issues posted to their list
3. Add illustrations to definition for each value of 'writing-mode'.
4. Write tests for 'direction' propagation and check against the spec.
5. Is this closed? https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0092.html

Open//Accepted/OutOfScope/Invalid/Rejected/Retracted

----
Issue 1.
Summary:  Rename extent/measure to block-size/inline-size?
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Feb/0822.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0559.html
----
Issue 2.
Summary:  Rename 'caption-side: start/end-outside keywords to block-start/end-outside
From:     MURAKAMI Shinyu
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0359.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
Closed:   Invalid
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
----
Issue 3.
Summary:  Treat 'caption-side: bottom' as 'caption-side: block-end'
From:     Murakami Shinyu
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0359.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0068.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0069.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0254.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0158.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
----
Issue 4.
Summary:  Clarify meaning of 'direction' in vertical text
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0037.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0041.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0066.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0071.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 5.
Summary:  Why can't we use bidi to auto-rotate RTL text downward?
From:     James Clark
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0058.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0255.html
Closed:   Question
----
Issue 6.
Summary:  Atomic inline "capable" of providing its own  baseline
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0107.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0377.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0100.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 7.
Summary:  sideways-left with other text-orientation descendant
From:     Simon Sapin
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014May/0108.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0282.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 8.
Summary:  Allow for magical TCY non-descender handling
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0426.html
Closed:   Retracted
----
Issue 9.
Summary:  TCY should be bidi isolated
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0428.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0070.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 10.
Summary:  TCY line breaking as U+FFFC
From:     fantasai
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jun/0429.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0260.html
Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2015JanMar/0080.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0002.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0187.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 11.
Summary:  text-combine-upright Applies to: non-replaced inline elements
From:     Snsk Matsuki
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0284.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0304.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 12.
Summary:  Clarify that non-square TCY glyphs also have non-square layout size
From:     Masataka Yakura
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0310.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0256.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 13.
Summary:  Clarify which font is used for finding advance height of non-square TCY
From:     Masataka Yakura
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0310.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0256.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 14.
Summary:  Auto margins and shrinkwrapping
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0502.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
Closed:   Retracted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0293.html
----
Issue 15.
Summary:  run-in boxes
From:     Masataka Yakura
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0564.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0257.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 16.
Summary:  elements that `text-combine-upright` applies
From:     Masataka Yakura
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0565.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jul/0594.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0036.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 17.
Summary:  confusion over rotated sideways and oriented upright
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0176.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0177.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0208.html
----
Issue 18.
Summary:  central baseline of text with  'text-orientation: upright'
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0388.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0008.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0046.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0047.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0053.html
----
Issue 19.
Summary:  Wrong image in section 5.
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Aug/0425.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0465.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0481.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0258.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 20.
Summary:  propagation of 'direction' from <body>
From:     L. David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Sep/0303.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0393.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0221.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0101.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 21.
Summary:  Underline in vertical text
From:     Brian Birtles
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0355.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0364.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 22.
Summary:  9.1.1 tcy element in example 20; extra >; non-interrupted sequence of characters
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0113.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0286.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 23.
Summary:  bidi-isolate Shadow DOM
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0282.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0358.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0363.html
Note:     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0453.html
Closed:   Retracted
----
Issue 24.
Summary:  Margin Collapsing Orthogonal Flows
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Dec/0346.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0287.html
Closed:   Retracted
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 25.
Summary:  Remove text-orientation: sideways-left
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0130.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0155.html
Note:     Accepted to mark at-risk
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0188.html
----
Issue 26.
Summary:  Drop Appendix B: Bidi Rules for HTML 4 (was Re:  [css-scoping] unicode-bidi in Shadow DOM, and possibly other properties?
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0330.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0493.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 27.
Summary:  5 small issues
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0487.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0168.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 28.
Summary:  Writing-mode of alt text and replaced content  of textarea, input =?UTF-8?Q?type=3D=22text=22?=
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0011.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0012.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 29.
Summary:  [css3-background]background-position:bottom to root elements
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0506.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0529.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0531.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0532.html
----
Issue 30.
Summary:  float interaction when line-left and line-right swap
From:     L. David Baron
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0026.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 31.
Summary:  text-combine-upright (TCY) on ::marker
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0043.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0143.html
----
Issue 32.
Summary:  overly-long 'auto' height child block in orthogonal flow
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0208.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0209.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0214.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0072.html
Closed:   Question
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 33.
Summary:  Defer auto-muticol behavior for orthogonal Flows
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0212.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0011.html
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0313.html
----
Issue 34.
Summary:  Propose to weaken upright rendering of horizontal-only scripts
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0386.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0397.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0232.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0236.html
----
Issue 35.
Summary:  Propose to defer orthogonal table cells
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0387.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0313.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0313.html
----
Issue 36.
Summary:  Clarify shrink-to-fit sizing of orthogonal flows
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0011.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0125.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
----
Issue 37.
Summary:  Update spec
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0026.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0057.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 38.
Summary:  [css-writing-modes][svg] SVG and writing-mode
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0092.html
Resolved: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0313.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 39.
Summary:  Confused testcase
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0144.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0145.html
Closed:   Invalid
----
Issue 40.
Summary:  Clarify line-under and line-over of text with 'text-orientation: upright'
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0161.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0211.html
Closed:   Accepted
Closed:   Editorial
----
Issue 41.
Summary:  proposed writing-mode: sideways-left and  text-orientation: sideways
From:     Koji Ishii
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0040.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0060.html
Closed:   Accepted
----
Issue 42.
Summary:  always synthesize inline-block central baseline
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0116.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0324.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0007.html
Closed:   Rejected
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0039.html
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 43.
Summary:  [css-writing-modes-3] range limit for 'text-combine-upright: all'  versus 'text-combine-upright: digits <integer>'
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0255.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0257.html
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0262.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0301.html
Closed:   Invalid
Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0302.html
----
Issue 44.
Summary:  [css-writing-modes-3] Editorial nit in Example 15 of 9.1.1
From:     Gérard Talbot
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0256.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0259.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
----
Issue 46.
Summary:  [css-ruby] The writing-mode property on ruby internal boxes
From:     Xidorn Quan
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0165.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
Note:     Issue against CSS Ruby
----
Issue 47.
Summary:  'writing-mode' and deprecated SVG values
From:     Dirk Schulze
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0405.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0290.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Sep/0016.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0021.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0028.html
----
Issue 48.
Summary:  Orientation of 300x150 default object size in vertical writing modes
From:     Jonathan Kew
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0049.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0061.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0329.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: http://www.w3.org/mid/CADhPm3s66T2JeNNJb59J5pbGy0+DSC7QMibPn8gTJ5j+i65T-A@mail.gmail.com
----
Issue 49.
Summary:  Clarify application of writing-mode to external content
From:     Jonathan Kew
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0049.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0329.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor's discretion
----
Issue 50.
Summary:  proposed 'writing-mode:sideways-*' values: effect on computed value of 'display'
From:     Jonathan Kew
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0201.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0220.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editor's Discretion
----
Issue 51.
Summary:  synthesizing baseline tables for replaced elements
From:     Stephen Zilles
Comment:  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0320.html
Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0327.html
Closed:   OutOfScope
----
Issue 52.
Summary:  Logical keywords for CSS2.0 top-outside/bottom-outside
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jul/0004.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0160.html
Closed:   Rejected
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0113.html
----
Issue 53.
Summary:  Computation of writing-mode aliases
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0175.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0182.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0024.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0028.html
----
Issue 54.
Summary:  Computation of sideways/sideways-right
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0163.html
Response: 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: 
----
Issue 55.
Summary:  Parsing values of glyph-orientation-vertical
From:     Amelia Bellamy-Royds
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0024.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0028.html
Closed:   Accepted
Verified: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0028.html
Resolved: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2015Oct/0028.html
----
