# CSS Contain Level 1 Disposition of Comments for 2019-04-30 CR

Review document: https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/CR-css-contain-1-20190430/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-contain-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

- Accepted or Rejected and positive response
- Rejected and no response
- Rejected and negative response
- Deferred
- Out-of-Scope or Invalid and not verified

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as `Accepted`, `OutOfScope`, `Invalid`, `Rejected`, or `Retracted`. `Verified` indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

    Issue 1. #
    Summary:  Improve cross-spec definition linking
    From:     Daniel Holbert
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3889
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3889#issuecomment-490202368
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3898
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial

    Issue 2. #
    Summary:  contain:size for grid containers is underspecified
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490203339
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490227116
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3892#issuecomment-490255708
    Closed:   Invalid
    Resolved: Editors' discretion

    Issue 3. #
    Summary:  Be more rigorous in using terminology (box vs element)
    From:     Mats Palmgren
    Comment:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4189
    Response: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4190
    Closed:   Accepted
    Resolved: Editorial
    Verified: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4190#pullrequestreview-273847840