# Specification Quality Checklist: Legacy Business Application Infrastructure

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-02-18
**Feature**: [001-my-legacy-workload/spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Validation Notes

### Content Quality Assessment
- **✅ Pass**: Specification focuses on infrastructure requirements (WHAT) without specifying HOW to implement (e.g., specific Terraform syntax, module parameters beyond identifying which AVM modules to use)
- **✅ Pass**: Written for infrastructure stakeholders and operations teams - describes Azure resources, security controls, and operational requirements
- **✅ Pass**: All mandatory sections present: User Scenarios & Testing, Requirements, Success Criteria, Assumptions, Dependencies, Out of Scope

### Requirement Completeness Assessment
- **✅ Pass**: Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - all requirements fully specified based on user input
- **✅ Pass**: Requirements are testable - each FR and SEC item can be verified (e.g., "VM MUST have 2+ CPU cores" - check VM properties; "NSG MUST allow RDP from Bastion only" - check NSG rules)
- **✅ Pass**: Success criteria are measurable with specific metrics (e.g., "deployment completes within 30 minutes", "RDP connection established within 2 minutes", "cost under $200/month")
- **✅ Pass**: Success criteria avoid implementation details - focus on outcomes (e.g., "VM can mount file share" not "private endpoint DNS configuration works")
- **✅ Pass**: Acceptance scenarios defined for all 4 user stories with Given/When/Then format
- **✅ Pass**: Edge cases identified (8 scenarios covering naming limits, zone availability, DNS resolution, secret conflicts, NSG rules, storage naming, subnet sizing, disk attachment)
- **✅ Pass**: Scope clearly bounded with detailed "Out of Scope" section (15 items explicitly excluded like HA config, DR, multiple environments, domain join, etc.)
- **✅ Pass**: Dependencies section lists all prerequisites (Terraform version, Azure CLI, AVM modules, Azure subscription,state backend, etc.)
- **✅ Pass**: Assumptions section documents all implicit decisions (15 assumptions covering quotas, state backend existence, permissions, naming conflicts, zone support, application compatibility, etc.)

### Feature Readiness Assessment
- **✅ Pass**: All 25 functional requirements map to user stories and have testable acceptance criteria
- **✅ Pass**: 4 user stories cover complete infrastructure lifecycle: P1 (core compute/network), P2 (secure access), P3 (storage), P4 (internet/monitoring)
- **✅ Pass**: Each user story independently testable and deliverable
- **✅ Pass**: Success criteria define 13 measurable outcomes aligned with requirements
- **✅ Pass**: No Terraform syntax or module-specific parameters in spec (appropriate - those belong in plan/implementation phase)

### Specification Completeness: READY FOR PLANNING ✅

**Summary**: Specification passes all quality gates. No clarifications needed. Ready to proceed with `/speckit.plan` to generate implementation plan.

**Recommended Next Steps**:
1. Run `/speckit.plan` to generate implementation plan with Terraform architecture
2. During planning phase, research AVM module documentation for each identified resource
3. Define Technical Context (Terraform version, provider versions, AVM module versions)
4. Create Project Structure (terraform/ directory layout)
5. Generate tasks.md with phased implementation (Setup → Foundational → US1-US4 → Polish)
