.. _testing:

==============
Testing libc++
==============

.. contents::
  :local:

Getting Started
===============

libc++ uses LIT to configure and run its tests.

The primary way to run the libc++ tests is by using ``make check-cxx``.

However since libc++ can be used in any number of possible
configurations it is important to customize the way LIT builds and runs
the tests. This guide provides information on how to use LIT directly to
test libc++.

Please see the `Lit Command Guide`_ for more information about LIT.

.. _LIT Command Guide: https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/lit.html

Dependencies
------------

The libc++ test suite has a few optional dependencies. These can be installed
with ``pip install -r libcxx/test/requirements.txt``. Installing these dependencies
will ensure that the maximum number of tests can be run.

Usage
-----

After :ref:`building libc++ <VendorDocumentation>`, you can run parts of the libc++ test suite by simply
running ``llvm-lit`` on a specified test or directory. If you're unsure
whether the required libraries have been built, you can use the
``cxx-test-depends`` target. For example:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ cd <monorepo-root>
  $ make -C <build> cxx-test-depends # If you want to make sure the targets get rebuilt
  $ <build>/bin/llvm-lit -sv libcxx/test/std/re # Run all of the std::regex tests
  $ <build>/bin/llvm-lit -sv libcxx/test/std/depr/depr.c.headers/stdlib_h.pass.cpp # Run a single test
  $ <build>/bin/llvm-lit -sv libcxx/test/std/atomics libcxx/test/std/threads # Test std::thread and std::atomic

If you used **ninja** as your build system, running ``ninja -C <build> check-cxx`` will run
all the tests in the libc++ testsuite.

.. note::
  If you used the Bootstrapping build instead of the default runtimes build, the
  ``cxx-test-depends`` target is instead named ``runtimes-test-depends``, and
  you will need to prefix ``<build>/runtimes/runtimes-<target>-bins/`` to the
  paths of all tests. For example, to run all the libcxx tests you can do
  ``<build>/bin/llvm-lit -sv <build>/runtimes/runtimes-bins/libcxx/test``.

In the default configuration, the tests are built against headers that form a
fake installation root of libc++. This installation root has to be updated when
changes are made to the headers, so you should re-run the ``cxx-test-depends``
target before running the tests manually with ``lit`` when you make any sort of
change, including to the headers. We recommend using the provided ``libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit``
script to automate this so you don't have to think about building test dependencies
every time:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ cd <monorepo-root>
  $ libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit <build> -sv libcxx/test/std/re # Build testing dependencies and run all of the std::regex tests

Sometimes you'll want to change the way LIT is running the tests. Custom options
can be specified using the ``--param <name>=<val>`` flag. The most common option
you'll want to change is the standard dialect (ie ``-std=c++XX``). By default the
test suite will select the newest C++ dialect supported by the compiler and use
that. However, you can manually specify the option like so if you want:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit <build> -sv libcxx/test/std/containers # Run the tests with the newest -std
  $ libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit <build> -sv libcxx/test/std/containers --param std=c++03 # Run the tests in C++03

Other parameters are supported by the test suite. Those are defined in ``libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/params.py``.
If you want to customize how to run the libc++ test suite beyond what is available
in ``params.py``, you most likely want to use a custom site configuration instead.

The libc++ test suite works by loading a site configuration that defines various
"base" parameters (via Lit substitutions). These base parameters represent things
like the compiler to use for running the tests, which default compiler and linker
flags to use, and how to run an executable. This system is meant to be easily
extended for custom needs, in particular when porting the libc++ test suite to
new platforms.

.. note::
  If you run the test suite on Apple platforms, we recommend adding the terminal application
  used to run the test suite to the list of "Developer Tools". This prevents the system from
  trying to scan each individual test binary for malware and dramatically speeds up the test
  suite.

Using a Custom Site Configuration
---------------------------------

By default, the libc++ test suite will use a site configuration that matches
the current CMake configuration. It does so by generating a ``lit.site.cfg``
file in the build directory from one of the configuration file templates in
``libcxx/test/configs/``, and pointing ``llvm-lit`` (which is a wrapper around
``llvm/utils/lit/lit.py``) to that file. So when you're running
``<build>/bin/llvm-lit`` either directly or indirectly, the generated ``lit.site.cfg``
file is always loaded instead of ``libcxx/test/lit.cfg.py``. If you want to use a
custom site configuration, simply point the CMake build to it using
``-DLIBCXX_TEST_CONFIG=<path-to-site-config>``, and that site configuration
will be used instead. That file can use CMake variables inside it to make
configuration easier.

   .. code-block:: bash

     $ cmake <options> -DLIBCXX_TEST_CONFIG=<path-to-site-config>
     $ libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit <build> -sv libcxx/test # will use your custom config file

Additional tools
----------------

The libc++ test suite uses a few optional tools to improve the code quality.

These tools are:

- clang-tidy (you might need additional dev packages to compile libc++-specific clang-tidy checks)

Reproducing CI issues locally
-----------------------------

Libc++ has extensive CI that tests various configurations of the library. The testing for
all these configurations is located in ``libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot``. Most of our
CI jobs are being run on a Docker image for reproducibility. The definition of this Docker
image is located in ``libcxx/utils/ci/Dockerfile``. If you are looking to reproduce the
failure of a specific CI job locally, you should first drop into a Docker container that
matches our CI images by running ``libcxx/utils/ci/run-buildbot-container``, and then run
the specific CI job that you're interested in (from within the container) using the ``run-buildbot``
script above. If you want to control which compiler is used, you can set the ``CC`` and the
``CXX`` environment variables before calling ``run-buildbot`` to select the right compiler.
Take note that some CI jobs are testing the library on specific platforms and are *not* run
in our Docker image. In the general case, it is not possible to reproduce these failures
locally, unless they aren't specific to the platform.

Also note that the Docker container shares the same filesystem as your local machine, so
modifying files on your local machine will also modify what the Docker container sees.
This is useful for editing source files as you're testing your code in the Docker container.

Writing Tests
=============

When writing tests for the libc++ test suite, you should follow a few guidelines.
This will ensure that your tests can run on a wide variety of hardware and under
a wide variety of configurations. We have several unusual configurations such as
building the tests on one host but running them on a different host, which add a
few requirements to the test suite. Here's some stuff you should know:

- All tests are run in a temporary directory that is unique to that test and
  cleaned up after the test is done.
- When a test needs data files as inputs, these data files can be saved in the
  repository (when reasonable) and referenced by the test as
  ``// FILE_DEPENDENCIES: <path-to-dependencies>``. Copies of these files or
  directories will be made available to the test in the temporary directory
  where it is run.
- You should never hardcode a path from the build-host in a test, because that
  path will not necessarily be available on the host where the tests are run.
- You should try to reduce the runtime dependencies of each test to the minimum.
  For example, requiring Python to run a test is bad, since Python is not
  necessarily available on all devices we may want to run the tests on (even
  though supporting Python is probably trivial for the build-host).

Structure of the testing related directories
--------------------------------------------

The tests of libc++ are stored in libc++'s testing related subdirectories:

- ``libcxx/test/support`` This directory contains several helper headers with
  generic parts for the tests. The most important header is ``test_macros.h``.
  This file contains configuration information regarding the platform used.
  This is similar to the ``__config`` file in libc++'s ``include`` directory.
  Since libc++'s tests are used by other Standard libraries, tests should use
  the ``TEST_FOO`` macros instead of the ``_LIBCPP_FOO`` macros, which are
  specific to libc++.
- ``libcxx/test/std`` This directory contains the tests that validate the library under
  test conforms to the C++ Standard. The paths and the names of the test match
  the section names in the C++ Standard. Note that the C++ Standard sometimes
  reorganises its structure, therefore some tests are at a location based on
  where they appeared historically in the standard. We try to strike a balance
  between keeping things at up-to-date locations and unnecessary churn.
- ``libcxx/test/libcxx`` This directory contains the tests that validate libc++
  specific behavior and implementation details. For example, libc++ has
  "wrapped iterators" that perform bounds checks. Since those are specific to
  libc++ and not mandated by the Standard, tests for those are located under
  ``libcxx/test/libcxx``. The structure of this directories follows the
  structure of ``libcxx/test/std``.

Structure of a test
-------------------

Some platforms where libc++ is tested have requirement on the signature of
``main`` and require ``main`` to explicitly return a value. Therefore the
typical ``main`` function should look like:

.. code-block:: cpp

  int main(int, char**) {
    ...
    return 0;
  }


The C++ Standard has ``constexpr`` requirements. The typical way to test that,
is to create a helper ``test`` function that returns a ``bool`` and use the
following ``main`` function:

.. code-block:: cpp

  constexpr bool test() {
    ...
    return true;
  }

  int main(int, char**) {
    test()
    static_assert(test());

    return 0;
  }

Tests in libc++ mainly use ``assert`` and ``static_assert`` for testing. There
are a few helper macros and function that can be used to make it easier to
write common tests.

libcxx/test/support/assert_macros.h
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The header contains several macros with user specified log messages. This is
useful when a normal assertion failure lacks the information to easily
understand why the test has failed. This usually happens when the test is in a
helper function. For example the ``std::format`` tests use a helper function
for its validation. When the test fails it will give the line in the helper
function with the condition ``out == expected`` failed. Without knowing what
the value of ``format string``, ``out`` and ``expected`` are it is not easy to
understand why the test has failed. By logging these three values the point of
failure can be found without resorting to a debugger.

Several of these macros are documented to take an ``ARG``. This ``ARG``:

 - if it is a ``const char*`` or ``std::string`` its contents are written to
   the ``stderr``,
 - otherwise it must be a callable that is invoked without any additional
   arguments and is expected to produce useful output to e.g. ``stderr``.

This makes it possible to write additional information when a test fails,
either by supplying a hard-coded string or generate it at runtime.

TEST_FAIL(ARG)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This macro is an unconditional failure with a log message ``ARG``. The main
use-case is to fail when code is reached that should be unreachable.


TEST_REQUIRE(CONDITION, ARG)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This macro requires its ``CONDITION`` to evaluate to ``true``. If that fails it
will fail the test with a log message ``ARG``.


TEST_LIBCPP_REQUIRE((CONDITION, ARG)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

If the library under test is libc++ it behaves like ``TEST_REQUIRE``, else it
is a no-op. This makes it possible to test libc++ specific behaviour. For
example testing whether the ``what()`` of an exception thrown matches libc++'s
expectations. (Usually the Standard requires certain exceptions to be thrown,
but not the contents of its ``what()`` message.)


TEST_DOES_NOT_THROW(EXPR)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Validates execution of ``EXPR`` does not throw an exception.

TEST_THROWS_TYPE(TYPE, EXPR)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Validates the execution of ``EXPR`` throws an exception of the type ``TYPE``.


TEST_VALIDATE_EXCEPTION(TYPE, PRED, EXPR)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Validates the execution of ``EXPR`` throws an exception of the type ``TYPE``
which passes validation of ``PRED``. Using this macro makes it easier to write
tests using exceptions. The code to write a test manually would be:


.. code-block:: cpp

  void test_exception([[maybe_unused]] int arg) {
  #ifndef TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS // do nothing when tests are disabled
    try {
      foo(arg);
      assert(false); // validates foo really throws
    } catch ([[maybe_unused]] const bar& e) {
      LIBCPP_ASSERT(e.what() == what);
      return;
    }
    assert(false); // validates bar was thrown
  #endif
    }

The same test using a macro:

.. code-block:: cpp

  void test_exception([[maybe_unused]] int arg) {
    TEST_VALIDATE_EXCEPTION(bar,
                            [](const bar& e) {
                              LIBCPP_ASSERT(e.what() == what);
                            },
                            foo(arg));
    }


libcxx/test/support/concat_macros.h
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This file contains a helper macro ``TEST_WRITE_CONCATENATED`` to lazily
concatenate its arguments to a ``std::string`` and write it to ``stderr``. When
the output can't be concatenated a default message will be written to
``stderr``. This is useful for tests where the arguments use different
character types like ``char`` and ``wchar_t``, the latter can't simply be
written to ``stderr``.

This macro is in a different header as ``assert_macros.h`` since it pulls in
additional headers.

 .. note: This macro can only be used in test using C++20 or newer. The macro
          was added at a time where most of libc++'s C++17 support was complete.
          Since it is not expected to add this to existing tests no effort was
          taken to make it work in earlier language versions.


Test names
----------

The names of test files have meaning for the libc++-specific configuration of
Lit. Based on the pattern that matches the name of a test file, Lit will test
the code contained therein in different ways. Refer to the `Lit Meaning of libc++
Test Filenames`_ when determining the names for new test files.

.. _Lit Meaning of libc++ Test Filenames:
.. list-table:: Lit Meaning of libc++ Test Filenames
   :widths: 25 75
   :header-rows: 1

   * - Name Pattern
     - Meaning
   * - ``FOO.pass.cpp``
     - Checks whether the C++ code in the file compiles, links and runs successfully.
   * - ``FOO.pass.mm``
     - Same as ``FOO.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.

   * - ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``
     - Checks whether the C++ code in the file compiles successfully. In general, prefer ``compile`` tests over ``verify`` tests,
       subject to the specific recommendations, below, for when to write ``verify`` tests.
   * - ``FOO.compile.pass.mm``
     - Same as ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.
   * - ``FOO.compile.fail.cpp``
     - Checks that the code in the file does *not* compile successfully.

   * - ``FOO.verify.cpp``
     - Compiles with clang-verify. This type of test is automatically marked as UNSUPPORTED if the compiler does not support clang-verify.
       For additional information about how to write ``verify`` tests, see the `Internals Manual <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#verifying-diagnostics>`_.
       Prefer `verify` tests over ``compile`` tests to test that compilation fails for a particular reason. For example, use a ``verify`` test
       to ensure that

       * an expected ``static_assert`` is triggered;
       * the use of deprecated functions generates the proper warning;
       * removed functions are no longer usable; or
       * return values from functions marked ``[[nodiscard]]`` are stored.

   * - ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``
     - Checks that the C++ code in the file compiles and links successfully -- no run attempted.
   * - ``FOO.link.pass.mm``
     - Same as ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.
   * - ``FOO.link.fail.cpp``
     - Checks whether the C++ code in the file fails to link after successful compilation.
   * - ``FOO.link.fail.mm``
     - Same as ``FOO.link.fail.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.

   * - ``FOO.sh.<anything>``
     - A *builtin Lit Shell* test.
   * - ``FOO.gen.<anything>``
     - A variant of a *Lit Shell* test that generates one or more Lit tests on the fly. Executing this test must generate one or more files as expected
       by LLVM split-file. Each generated file will drive an invocation of a separate Lit test. The format of the generated file will determine the type
       of Lit test to be executed. This can be used to generate multiple Lit tests from a single source file, which is useful for testing repetitive properties
       in the library. Be careful not to abuse this since this is not a replacement for usual code reuse techniques.

   * - ``FOO.bench.cpp``
     - A benchmark test. These tests are linked against the GoogleBenchmark library and generally consist of micro-benchmarks of individual
       components of the library.


libc++-Specific Lit Features
----------------------------

Custom Directives
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lit has many directives built in (e.g., ``DEFINE``, ``UNSUPPORTED``). In addition to those directives, libc++ adds two additional libc++-specific directives that makes
writing tests easier. See `libc++-specific Lit Directives`_ for more information about the ``FILE_DEPENDENCIES``, ``ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS``, and ``MODULE_DEPENDENCIES`` libc++-specific directives.

.. _libc++-specific Lit Directives:
.. list-table:: libc++-specific Lit Directives
   :widths: 20 35 45
   :header-rows: 1

   * - Directive
     - Parameters
     - Usage
   * - ``FILE_DEPENDENCIES``
     - ``// FILE_DEPENDENCIES: file, directory, /path/to/file, ...``
     - The paths given to the ``FILE_DEPENDENCIES`` directive can specify directories or specific files upon which a given test depend. For example, a test that requires some test
       input stored in a data file would use this libc++-specific Lit directive. When a test file contains the ``FILE_DEPENDENCIES`` directive, Lit will collect the named files and copy
       them to the directory represented by the ``%{temp}`` substitution before the test executes. The copy is performed from the directory represented by the ``%S`` substitution
       (i.e. the source directory of the test being executed) which makes it possible to use relative paths to specify the location of dependency files. After Lit copies
       all the dependent files to the directory specified by the ``%{temp}`` substitution, that directory should contain *all* the necessary inputs to run. In other words,
       it should be possible to copy the contents of the directory specified by the ``%{temp}`` substitution to a remote host where the execution of the test will actually occur.
   * - ``ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS``
     - ``// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS: flag1 flag2 ...``
     - The additional compiler flags specified by a space-separated list to the ``ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS`` libc++-specific Lit directive will be added to the end of the ``%{compile_flags}``
       substitution for the test that contains it. This libc++-specific Lit directive makes it possible to add special compilation flags without having to resort to writing a ``.sh.cpp`` test (see
       `Lit Meaning of libc++ Test Filenames`_), more powerful but perhaps overkill.
   * - ``MODULE_DEPENDENCIES``
     - ``// MODULE_DEPENDENCIES: std std.compat``
     - This directive will build the required C++23 standard library
       modules and add the additional compiler flags in
       %{compile_flags}. (Libc++ offers these modules in C++20 as an
       extension.)


C++ Standard version tests
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Historically libc++ tests used to filter the tests for C++ Standard versions
with lit directives like:

.. code-block:: cpp

   // UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17, c++20, c++23

With C++ Standards released every 3 years, this solution is not scalable.
Instead use:

.. code-block:: cpp

   // REQUIRES: std-at-least-c++26

There is no corresponding ``std-at-most-c++23``. This could be useful when
tests are only valid for a small set of standard versions. For example, a
deprecation test is only valid when the feature is deprecated until it is
removed from the Standard. These tests should be written like:

.. code-block:: cpp

   // REQUIRES: c++17 || c++20 || c++23

.. note::

   There are a lot of tests with the first style, these can remain as they are.
   The new style is only intended to be used for new tests.


Benchmarks
==========

Libc++'s test suite also contains benchmarks. Many benchmarks are written using the `Google Benchmark`_
library, a copy of which is stored in the LLVM monorepo. For more information about using the Google
Benchmark library, see the `official documentation <https://github.com/google/benchmark>`_.

The benchmarks are located under ``libcxx/test/benchmarks``. Running a benchmark
works in the same way as running a test. Both the benchmarks and the tests share
the same configuration, so make sure to enable the relevant optimization level
when running the benchmarks. For example,

.. code-block:: bash

  $ libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit <build> libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/string.bench.cpp --show-all --param optimization=speed

Note that benchmarks are only dry-run when run via the ``check-cxx`` target since
we only want to make sure they don't rot. Do not rely on the results of benchmarks
run through ``check-cxx`` for anything, instead run the benchmarks manually using
the instructions for running individual tests.

If you want to compare the results of different benchmark runs, we recommend using the
``compare-benchmarks`` helper tool. Note that the script has some dependencies, which can
be installed with:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ python -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate # Optional but recommended
  $ pip install -r libcxx/utils/requirements.txt

Once that's done, start by configuring CMake in a build directory and running one or
more benchmarks, as usual:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ cmake -S runtimes -B <build> [...]
  $ libcxx/utils/libcxx-lit <build> libcxx/test/benchmarks/containers/string.bench.cpp --param optimization=speed

Then, get the consolidated benchmark output for that run using ``consolidate-benchmarks``:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ libcxx/utils/consolidate-benchmarks <build> > baseline.lnt

The ``baseline.lnt`` file will contain a consolidation of all the benchmark results present in the build
directory. You can then make the desired modifications to the code, run the benchmark(s) again, and then run:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ libcxx/utils/consolidate-benchmarks <build> > candidate.lnt

Finally, use ``compare-benchmarks`` to compare both:

.. code-block:: bash

  $ libcxx/utils/compare-benchmarks baseline.lnt candidate.lnt

  # Useful one-liner when iterating locally:
  $ libcxx/utils/compare-benchmarks baseline.lnt <(libcxx/utils/consolidate-benchmarks <build>)

The ``compare-benchmarks`` script provides some useful options like creating a chart to easily visualize
differences in a browser window. Use ``compare-benchmarks --help`` for details.

Additionally, adding a comment of the following form to a libc++ PR will cause the specified benchmarks to be run
on our pre-commit CI infrastructure and the results to be reported in the PR by our CI system:

.. code-block::

    /libcxx-bot benchmark <path/to/benchmark1.bench.cpp> <path/to/benchmark2.bench.cpp> ...

Note that this is currently experimental and the results should not be relied upon too strongly, since
we do not have dedicated hardware to run the benchmarks on.

.. _`Google Benchmark`: https://github.com/google/benchmark

.. _testing-hardening-assertions:

Testing hardening assertions
============================

Each hardening assertion should be tested using death tests (via the
``TEST_LIBCPP_ASSERT_FAILURE`` macro). Use the ``libcpp-hardening-mode`` Lit
feature to make sure the assertion is enabled in (and only in) the intended
modes. The convention is to use `assert.` in the name of the test file to make
it easier to identify as a hardening test, e.g. ``assert.my_func.pass.cpp``.
A toy example:

.. code-block:: cpp

  // Note: the following three annotations are currently needed to use the
  // `TEST_LIBCPP_ASSERT_FAILURE`.
  // REQUIRES: has-unix-headers
  // UNSUPPORTED: c++03
  // XFAIL: libcpp-hardening-mode=debug && availability-verbose_abort-missing

  // Example: only run this test in `fast`/`extensive`/`debug` modes.
  // UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-hardening-mode=none
  // Example: only run this test in the `debug` mode.
  // REQUIRES: libcpp-hardening-mode=debug
  // Example: only run this test in `extensive`/`debug` modes.
  // REQUIRES: libcpp-hardening-mode={{extensive|debug}}

  #include <header_being_tested>

  #include "check_assertion.h" // Contains the `TEST_LIBCPP_ASSERT_FAILURE` macro

  int main(int, char**) {
    std::type_being_tested foo;
    int bad_input = -1;
    TEST_LIBCPP_ASSERT_FAILURE(foo.some_function_that_asserts(bad_input),
        "The expected assertion message");

    return 0;
  }

Note that error messages are only tested (matched) if the ``debug``
hardening mode is used.
